(16-04-2024, 11:36 PM)Brian Doyle Wrote: You're just repeating the same questions over and over Alan...
On the contrary, Mr. Doyle, you are refusing to answer the questions, because if you dare the quicksand around you will continue to envelop you as your self-serving narrative void of facts continues to spiral downward out of control. You cannot say Sarah Stanton is in a dark dress and then later of your own choosing now put her in a white blouse (it's one or the other, Mr. Doyle, make up your mind sir)
It is well known in photography that certain cameras and film types will present light-colored objects as being dark in shade...The camera adjusts to the bright part of the subject field and therefore the contrast is skewed in the shade parts of the subject field, as seen in the Depository front entrance with its bright sun vs dark shade...We have already debated this and you ignored it every time I posted it (like trolls do)...You won't find any blond hair showing up in the dark/shade parts of Darnell because his camera and film is registering light-colored hair as dark, as seen with Stanton...
Oh, dear and let those of us reading along guess that that same effect plays a role in her considerable weight/girth and well pronounced forearms as well...You are only kidding yourself, Mr. Doyle, her hair colour is different from Prayer Man's and her physique is triple the size of Prayer Man. And. according to you she can be in a dark-hued dress with a hemline, then akin to the exploits of the "magic-bullet" can suddenly change her attire at will to fit your false assumptions. Are you taking yourself seriously, Mr. Doyle?
You practice a deceptive form of analysis Alan where you always stay on the offensive and must be asking the questions lest it becomes too clear that you are the one who has failed to answer the points...Because you make a bogus argument that white must appear white in shade with Darnell's equipment you avoid answering the fact that we can see Prayer Man pivot towards Frazier from Wiegman to Darnell...In Wiegman Prayer Man is facing forward towards the motorcade and in Darnell Prayer Man has turned towards Frazier...This pivot is the exact turn Frazier described Stanton as making at that exact time when she turned to tell him what Calvery had shouted...
Wrong. A-G-A-i-N.
Your false narrative would be better served if you chose to have Mr. Frazier (Buell Wesley) turn to his left, where there is a rather large female figure dressed in white 3x the size of Prayer Man. The only person on Mr. Frazier's right is the male Prayer Man figure.
Because you make a technically invalid argument that white must appear white you relieve yourself of having to answer the FACT that Altgens 6 shows everything to Frazier's left in clear detail...Therefore for your false claim, and misquoting of witnesses, that Stanton is to Frazier's left is provably false because if Stanton were to Frazier's left we would clearly see her in Altgens...But we don't...Even worse, if we go to Wiegman Z256 we can see the exact same scene in Altgens 6 taken at the exact same time from a 90 degree angle and Stanton is clearly not to Frazier's left...Every time I post this definitive proof you ignore it and repeat your same idiotic points...Altgens 6 and Wiegman Z256 prove that Stanton is not to Frazier's left...Every time I post this you ignore it and repeat your same trolling points...
Look for her in Weigman (Robert) and Darnell (Jimmy) if you dare...because there is a rather heavy-set woman there to Mr. Frazier's left. The only person to Mr. Frazier's right is the male Prayer Man figure. Moreover, Both Mrs. Stanton and the woman she was standing next to, Mrs. Sanders, shared that they stood together on the East side of the TSBD entrance steps. Together is defined as in close proximity with one another, not alone over on the opposite side of the entrance steps where the male Prayer Man is positioned.
Your idiotic points above do not make Lovelady's locating of Stanton to the far right of the entranceway go away...Nor does it make Prayer Man being in that exact spot in the Hughes Film go away...
Wrong A-G-A-I-N, Mr. Doyle.
You are confusing the actual evidence to merit your own "evidence"...in this case when Mr. Lovelady would look over his shoulder while finishing off his lunch right there on the steps, yes, of course, Mrs. Stanton was on his right (you keep shooting yourself in the foot, Mr. Doyle).
Mr. BALL. You ate your lunch on the steps?
Mr. LOVELADY. Yes, sir.
Mr. BALL. Who was with you?
Mr. LOVELADY. Bill Shelley and Sarah Stanton.
A while ago your trolling doppleganger "Alan Ford" posted the sharp Darnell frame, that clearly showed a female dress neckline on Prayer Man, on the Education Forum...The forum did its best to ignore that obvious proof...If we could post that image here you would see that Stanton's dress neckline was seen on Prayer Man in that Darnell frame...No one is trying to clean up Owens to see if we can match that neckline with Stanton but it doesn't matter because several converging instances of evidence already proved Stanton was Prayer Man...
The above should be enough for any credible researcher to realize Prayer Man has been proven to be Stanton so anyone who is ignoring it in contempt in order to offer already-refuted regressive arguments should be moderated...
Oh, dear...
On the contrary, Mr. Doyle, the Education Forum akin to the fine leadership here on this forum doesn't jump to conclusions every time someone shares "new" information in this case. Unlike you, the leadership here and over at the forum you mentioned care to fully examine everything in a fair/objective manner before drawing false clumsy conclusions about a woman 3x the size of Prayer Man opting to change her sex right there on the TSBD steps to become a MUCH smaller male figure now on steroids.
For the most part, Mr. Ford, and I have been cordial in our exchanges and I will continue to be. Save for our mutually agreed upon differences in who we think the male Prayer Man figure is. I respect his right to present his case, but as for me I am convinced the male Prayer Man figure is just who Mr. Murphy (Sean) and quite a few other exemplary researchers say He is.
"It's Him" -- Sean Murphy, November , 2013
Moderator Sandy Larsen
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Possibly Related Threads… | |||||
Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
Why Mark Knight Should Never Be Allowed To Be A Moderator | Brian Doyle | 6 | 1,160 |
14-06-2024, 05:15 PM Last Post: Brian Doyle |
|
Would someone give this info to Sandy Larson at the Ed Forum please! | Scott Kaiser | 40 | 32,046 |
17-12-2016, 02:20 AM Last Post: Scott Kaiser |
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)