29-05-2024, 12:03 AM
Larsen wrote:
Coming from Sandy Larsen who posted a very good quality photo analysis of the plaid pattern in the shirt of the man going up the Elm St extension in Couch/Darnell...Larsen proved beyond a doubt that man was Billy Lovelady, since the plaid pattern matched the plaid pattern of Lovelady's shirt in the Martin Film...When Larsen realized he had just proven the timing of when Frazier said he was talking to Sarah Stanton on the front steps, which was exactly at the time Shelley and Lovelady left the front steps and headed up the extension, Larsen deleted his photo analysis and refused to admit what he had proven...However this doesn't stop Sandy from shaming others and threatening moderation...Lying is OK for some but a reason for moderation for others...
- "I've said multiple times now that Pat is free to say these things, but must treat them as being his opinions of interpretations. In spite of doing so being intellectually dishonest. (I add this item because I think intellectual dishonesty is despicable.)"
Coming from Sandy Larsen who posted a very good quality photo analysis of the plaid pattern in the shirt of the man going up the Elm St extension in Couch/Darnell...Larsen proved beyond a doubt that man was Billy Lovelady, since the plaid pattern matched the plaid pattern of Lovelady's shirt in the Martin Film...When Larsen realized he had just proven the timing of when Frazier said he was talking to Sarah Stanton on the front steps, which was exactly at the time Shelley and Lovelady left the front steps and headed up the extension, Larsen deleted his photo analysis and refused to admit what he had proven...However this doesn't stop Sandy from shaming others and threatening moderation...Lying is OK for some but a reason for moderation for others...