30-05-2024, 02:53 PM
(This post was last modified: 30-05-2024, 04:38 PM by Brian Doyle.)
Sandy is over on the Education Forum making a special thread where Pat Speer's postings are examined under moderator scrutiny for their honesty and sincere handling of the evidence...This is something I wholeheartedly agree on because part of the problem with the Education Forum is its bizarre protecting of Lone Nutters and their dishonest rendering of the facts...This has been due for a long time...Larsen limits it to Speer's handling of James Jenkins' statements even though it applies to almost everything Pat discusses...
There was, however, no special moderators post for myself when James Gordon railroaded me off the board...I did not see Larsen make such a "transparent" moderator-only post where a discussion of Gordon's handling of my Prayer Man evidence was "openly" discussed for the purposes of fairness and correct moderation...In 2016 I joined the Education Forum and tried to post the Davidson Enhancement of Wiegman showing Sarah Stanton's face on Prayer Man...As years of further discoveries showed, this was a correct claim and the photo evidence backed it...When I posted that evidence in 2016 James Gordon rode my back on every post fielding false complaints by Private Message from the Prayer Man supporters and passing them along as moderator complaints against me...Gordon was clearly abusing his moderator power and was clearly switching the subject from the Davidson Enhancement to false complaints about methodology...When I pressed Gordon to please post examples of where I failed to practice required methodology Gordon responded "I don't have to and if you protest again I will ban you"...Gordon couldn't show any examples because I had not violated any rules or methodology requirements...In a clear case of abuse and unfair moderation Gordon then banned me anyway saying I was "Too indisciplined, insulting, and failed to follow the rules of evidence when shown"...And this was in response to the Davidson Enhancement that clearly showed Sarah Stanton's face on Prayer Man...Since then we have discovered layers of additional evidence that all heavily proved Prayer Man is Sarah Stanton...To this day none of it was ever allowed on the Education Forum...When I tried to get back on the Forum last year Gordon e-mailed "If you are allowed back on your nonsense will no longer be tolerated and you will be instantly banned"...Gordon is clearly dishonestly avoiding the issue of the evidence...The facts speak the loudest and it is clearly Gordon who is "failing to follow the rules of evidence when shown"...It is pretty clear to any honest person that Gordon reserves an unusual animus towards me because he is well aware of this and is not afraid to abuse his moderator power to prevent it from being known...
Sandy Larsen is a strong pro-Prayer Man researcher...His bias is clear and he has never allowed any of my evidence on the Education Forum even though he poses himself as a brave challenger of Education Forum corruption...My Prayer Man evidence is not a trivial matter...It has led to the discovery of one of the most important pieces of Conspiracy evidence in 60 years of research...That discovery is being censored on the Education Forum under its moderators (included fair-minded Sandy)...There's not one Education Forum member who is willing to stand up and post "What about a special moderator's thread for Brian Doyle and his Prayer Man evidence?"...That discussion is being prevented by Mark Knight who switched the subject and is willing to silence one of the most important discoveries in Kennedy research history all so he can enforce his loyalty to Gordon...Knight is saying one of the most important discoveries in research history is being denied because I called Kathy Beckett a bad name...I'm really impressed by Beckett and her moral magnaminity when she stepped forward and posted that my research should not be disappeared on her account...Or the EF members and Prayer Man supporters for that matter too...This is an overt gang action and rotten double standard that is much worse than anything Sandy Larsen protests while he controls the venue just like Knight and Gordon...The research community are cowards and they are afraid to hold Knight and Gordon accountable for their actions towards myself and my Prayer Man evidence because they don't want to admit they were wrong...No one steps up and forces the Prayer Man hijackers to answer for Davidson's new woman's dress neckline evidence in Darnell that further proves it beyond a doubt...This is just brazen lawless contempt the type of which destroys research communities...In any case you'll never see any phony honesty from Larsen posted on the Education Forum regarding myself and my Prayer Man evidence...
Roger Odisio committed a much worse offense of the type Sandy pretends to take umbrage with when he ignored my irrefutable proof and suggested Prayer Man could be proven to be Oswald with better images...When I tried to confront Odisio on Tony Krome's "Jacks" troll farm Odisio said he was going to "side-step" my challenge and not respond to it...The only reason the Prayer Man theory hasn't been formally refuted is because of the moderators on the main JFK forums...Sandy could call-out Gordon and Odisio with a much better case for lying and misrepresenting evidence in regard to their handling of my Prayer Man evidence...However, unfortunately, the internet allows JFK website moderators to form their websites according to their own personal biases and Sandy isn't about to show even-handed "transparency" if it means helping refute a theory he personally strongly endorsed...Not if it can be avoided by accusing the source of calling people names...
There was, however, no special moderators post for myself when James Gordon railroaded me off the board...I did not see Larsen make such a "transparent" moderator-only post where a discussion of Gordon's handling of my Prayer Man evidence was "openly" discussed for the purposes of fairness and correct moderation...In 2016 I joined the Education Forum and tried to post the Davidson Enhancement of Wiegman showing Sarah Stanton's face on Prayer Man...As years of further discoveries showed, this was a correct claim and the photo evidence backed it...When I posted that evidence in 2016 James Gordon rode my back on every post fielding false complaints by Private Message from the Prayer Man supporters and passing them along as moderator complaints against me...Gordon was clearly abusing his moderator power and was clearly switching the subject from the Davidson Enhancement to false complaints about methodology...When I pressed Gordon to please post examples of where I failed to practice required methodology Gordon responded "I don't have to and if you protest again I will ban you"...Gordon couldn't show any examples because I had not violated any rules or methodology requirements...In a clear case of abuse and unfair moderation Gordon then banned me anyway saying I was "Too indisciplined, insulting, and failed to follow the rules of evidence when shown"...And this was in response to the Davidson Enhancement that clearly showed Sarah Stanton's face on Prayer Man...Since then we have discovered layers of additional evidence that all heavily proved Prayer Man is Sarah Stanton...To this day none of it was ever allowed on the Education Forum...When I tried to get back on the Forum last year Gordon e-mailed "If you are allowed back on your nonsense will no longer be tolerated and you will be instantly banned"...Gordon is clearly dishonestly avoiding the issue of the evidence...The facts speak the loudest and it is clearly Gordon who is "failing to follow the rules of evidence when shown"...It is pretty clear to any honest person that Gordon reserves an unusual animus towards me because he is well aware of this and is not afraid to abuse his moderator power to prevent it from being known...
Sandy Larsen is a strong pro-Prayer Man researcher...His bias is clear and he has never allowed any of my evidence on the Education Forum even though he poses himself as a brave challenger of Education Forum corruption...My Prayer Man evidence is not a trivial matter...It has led to the discovery of one of the most important pieces of Conspiracy evidence in 60 years of research...That discovery is being censored on the Education Forum under its moderators (included fair-minded Sandy)...There's not one Education Forum member who is willing to stand up and post "What about a special moderator's thread for Brian Doyle and his Prayer Man evidence?"...That discussion is being prevented by Mark Knight who switched the subject and is willing to silence one of the most important discoveries in Kennedy research history all so he can enforce his loyalty to Gordon...Knight is saying one of the most important discoveries in research history is being denied because I called Kathy Beckett a bad name...I'm really impressed by Beckett and her moral magnaminity when she stepped forward and posted that my research should not be disappeared on her account...Or the EF members and Prayer Man supporters for that matter too...This is an overt gang action and rotten double standard that is much worse than anything Sandy Larsen protests while he controls the venue just like Knight and Gordon...The research community are cowards and they are afraid to hold Knight and Gordon accountable for their actions towards myself and my Prayer Man evidence because they don't want to admit they were wrong...No one steps up and forces the Prayer Man hijackers to answer for Davidson's new woman's dress neckline evidence in Darnell that further proves it beyond a doubt...This is just brazen lawless contempt the type of which destroys research communities...In any case you'll never see any phony honesty from Larsen posted on the Education Forum regarding myself and my Prayer Man evidence...
Roger Odisio committed a much worse offense of the type Sandy pretends to take umbrage with when he ignored my irrefutable proof and suggested Prayer Man could be proven to be Oswald with better images...When I tried to confront Odisio on Tony Krome's "Jacks" troll farm Odisio said he was going to "side-step" my challenge and not respond to it...The only reason the Prayer Man theory hasn't been formally refuted is because of the moderators on the main JFK forums...Sandy could call-out Gordon and Odisio with a much better case for lying and misrepresenting evidence in regard to their handling of my Prayer Man evidence...However, unfortunately, the internet allows JFK website moderators to form their websites according to their own personal biases and Sandy isn't about to show even-handed "transparency" if it means helping refute a theory he personally strongly endorsed...Not if it can be avoided by accusing the source of calling people names...