02-06-2024, 03:48 AM
(This post was last modified: 02-06-2024, 03:50 AM by Brian Doyle.)
Now it is time to call-out Jim DiEugenio and his treatment of the Prayer Man evidence...
DiEugenio is much more guilty than Speer on the same count of what Speer was found guilty of...Jim admitted to me that I had proven Prayer Man was too stocky to be Oswald (and is therefore the "heavy-set" Stanton) yet at the same time he wrote a review of Kamp's disinformation work 'Prayer Man More Than A Fuzzy Picture' giving positive praise to Kamp's refuted claim...Jim is much more guilty of violating the same rules that Speer was banned for...
But we are talking Sandy Larsen here who deletes posts he made that he realized help refute Oswald being Prayer Man...Sandy is also guilty of what he banned Speer for...Actually he's more guilty because a hypocrite who punishes others for the same violations he committed, but doesn't hold himself accountable to the same standard, is a worse offender...Sandy is permitting people to post a theory that has been refuted by an acceptable academic standard - the very rule he banned Speer for, because Sandy believes in the Prayer Man theory and is abusing his moderator position...They are also guilty of preventing showing of that correct evidence by banning...The Education Forum moderators are banning people for offenses they are guilty of as well...
The Education Forum moderators are also guilty of not answering for banning and censoring a person with the correct evidence...Banning for false reasons in order to cover-up their real motive of preventing the Prayer Man theory from being refuted...
DiEugenio is much more guilty than Speer on the same count of what Speer was found guilty of...Jim admitted to me that I had proven Prayer Man was too stocky to be Oswald (and is therefore the "heavy-set" Stanton) yet at the same time he wrote a review of Kamp's disinformation work 'Prayer Man More Than A Fuzzy Picture' giving positive praise to Kamp's refuted claim...Jim is much more guilty of violating the same rules that Speer was banned for...
But we are talking Sandy Larsen here who deletes posts he made that he realized help refute Oswald being Prayer Man...Sandy is also guilty of what he banned Speer for...Actually he's more guilty because a hypocrite who punishes others for the same violations he committed, but doesn't hold himself accountable to the same standard, is a worse offender...Sandy is permitting people to post a theory that has been refuted by an acceptable academic standard - the very rule he banned Speer for, because Sandy believes in the Prayer Man theory and is abusing his moderator position...They are also guilty of preventing showing of that correct evidence by banning...The Education Forum moderators are banning people for offenses they are guilty of as well...
The Education Forum moderators are also guilty of not answering for banning and censoring a person with the correct evidence...Banning for false reasons in order to cover-up their real motive of preventing the Prayer Man theory from being refuted...