03-06-2024, 04:16 PM
(This post was last modified: 03-06-2024, 04:25 PM by Brian Doyle.)
Quote: And it is NOT the responsibility of anyone, including the person you accused, to prove they didn't do what you claim they did.
If someone points to the upper back part of the head, at what specific point -- how many millimeters from what particular point of reference does the upper part of the head become NOT the top of the head? At what point on the skull does the "top of the head" begin and end? Yes, I'm asking for specificity in your response.
Otherwise, is the top HALF of the head still the "top of the head"? Or is it the top 25% of the head? Or only the top 2% of the head? If you cannot define your term with any degree of specificity, then perhaps Mr. Speer's interpretation of the term "top of the head" is slightly less specific than yours, which to this point seems quite subject to interpretation.
Knight shows the problem with the Education Forum better than anyone...In a case where Pat Speer has been mushing up and distorting the evidence in order to muddy the waters in favor of the Warren Commission for decades what does Knight do?...He comes in and defends the violator as if he was an innocent victim falling prey to Keven Hofeling's attempt to get him...This one action right here by Knight shows the problem with the Education Forum in a nutshell and shows how that forum goes out of its way to protect Lone Nutters at the expense of the truth...
Knight seems oblivious to the fact that Speer has been dishonestly muddying the waters with claims that always bring doubt to the main conspiracy evidence...The answer to Knight's ill-considered attempt to confront Hofeling above is that we are not dealing with subjective degrees of interpretation...We are dealing with the main Parkland witnesses and Clint Hill witnessing a clearly-visible single avulsive exit wound in the rear Occiput that was evidence of a gunshot from the front...Lifton discovered evidence that a covert autopsy altered this wound in order to show wounds from Oswald's position...Commander Pitzer was murdered by CIA because he captured evidence of that covert autopsy on his remote filming equipment...There's no confusion about the terms of what is being argued here so Knight completely misses the boat on the issue that is being raised here and in doing so shows what the problem is with the Education Forum...Just the fact Knight needs this explained to him is evidence of why he should never be moderator...Keep in mind this same Mark Knight, who is defending what is basically a Lone Nutter traitor to Conspiracy research, is the same person who veto-ed my re-admission to the Education Forum...Knight does not have the personal ability to oversee dangerous political assassination evidence and is basically a social media feel good referee who lacks what it takes to moderate high level evidence debate...It is time for Knight to go in order for the Education Forum to finally gain some credibility, Peer Review, and fair moderation...
Quote:I eagerly await your attempts to have me suspended or even banned from the forum of which I appear to be the last currently active owner. This is gonna be a hoot.
When I'm suspended, maybe DVP can go by his former business and pick up a bucket [extra crispy, please, David!] and deliver it to me. I'm 25 miles west of Louisville, David...the same latitude as the first turn at Churchill Downs, and the same longitude as the end of pit road at Talladega Speedway. I'll supply the drinks as long as you drink decaf cola."
The clueless hypocrite Knight takes a sarcastic tone towards Larsen, however he hypocritically ignores that what he mocks is exactly what the Education Forum did to me for the crime of posting the correct evidence on Prayer Man...When Gordon lied about his reasons for banning me I did not see any such appeal to fairness and the right to post evidence from Knight...In fact, Knight responded to my banning by putting a knife in my back and calling me a shit-poster, even though he publicly admitted that he did not know why I was banned in the first place...Which just goes to show that Knight is one of the biggest supporting members of the lynch mobs he pretends to criticize...Right now Mark Knight, the same person who wrote the phony sanctimony above, is keeping one of the most important evidence discoveries in assassination history off the Education Forum because he says I called Kathy Beckett a bad name...But that doesn't stop him from sarcastically mocking wrongful moderation...The "shit-poster" Knight is persecuting and censoring happens to have discovered one of the most important evidence discoveries in research history that Knight is single-handedly responsible for the prevention of it being known on the Education Forum...Knight doesn't seem to care at all about his role in the prevention of that important evidence or its affect on JFK research...Which is why he's unqualified for moderator, is willing to carry out gang attacks, and needs to go...Mark Knight is doing the moderator version of what Speer is guilty of...