30-09-2008, 04:56 AM
I've long been confused about something. The plotters went to a lot of trouble to portray the Dallas patsy--Oswald--as a left winger, a communist (what Jim Garrison calls "sheep dipping"). Presumably that was in keeping with the overall government/CIA agenda of demonizing communist and socialist leaders in other countries, a prime example being Castro. Possibly a thwarted secondary objective of the sheep dipping and assassination was to justify the invasion of Cuba.
However, if former secret service agent Abraham Bolden is accurate (The Echo from Dealey Plaza), there was a foiled plot to murder President Kennedy three weeks earlier in Chicago. However, in the Chicago plot the presumed pasty--Thomas Vallee--was a right winger. (http://coverthistory.blogspot.com/2007_11_01_archive.html)
What secondary objective would there have been with a "right-wing radical" patsy?
Shouldn't there have been continuity of objectives between the plots?
However, if former secret service agent Abraham Bolden is accurate (The Echo from Dealey Plaza), there was a foiled plot to murder President Kennedy three weeks earlier in Chicago. However, in the Chicago plot the presumed pasty--Thomas Vallee--was a right winger. (http://coverthistory.blogspot.com/2007_11_01_archive.html)
What secondary objective would there have been with a "right-wing radical" patsy?
Shouldn't there have been continuity of objectives between the plots?