04-11-2009, 04:16 PM
(This post was last modified: 04-11-2009, 04:22 PM by Bernice Moore.)
Phil Dragoo Wrote:Bernice
Your photo of Lyndon Johnson stepping off the elevator shows him smiling.
Together with The Wink, a cynic might doubt his protestation:
All I have I would have given gladly not to be standing here today.
He begins his presidency here:
Lyndon Baines Johnson
Let Us Continue
delivered 27 November 1963
http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches...tinue.html
In four and a half years he would be announcing:
I shall not seek and I will not accept the nomination of my party as your President.
Lyndon Johnson - Remarks on Decision to not seek Reelection
What an amazing year. 1968. Tet was won, but Cronkite says it was lost, so Johnson quits. King is shot. Bobby is shot. Bremer shoots Wallace. The Whole World Was Watching. Nixon is elected.
In the Giancana book is the advice of Sam aka Mooney Giancana: To know who did it, look around to see who's still standing.
Nixon was taken down with Watergate.
And when Hunt died he pointed at Johnson.
Yet Zen advises do not mistake the finger pointing at the moon, for the moon.
Hi Phil..there iS a lot of smoke there seen by many people re lbj..but until any definite fire is found that's about it for now..much talk too little action in regards to THE TEXAS CINNECTION TOO MUCH PERHAPS WITHHELD FOR TOO MANY YEARS AND NOT SHARED SO IT COULD NOT BE GIVEN THE DEEP RESEARCH BY THE COMMUNITY PERHAPS SOME OF IT DESERVED...AND THOSE LIKE MADELEINE BROWN WHO DID SPEAK UP HAS AND HAVE BEEN TRASHED WITH REGULARITY BY THOSE WHO SEE NO CONNECTIONS WHATSOEVER IT SEEMS RE LBJ....THE WITNESSES LIE OF COURSE AGAIN.WHAT ESE IS NEW...I AM POSTING THIS LINK AS I FOUND THE INFO WITHIN SOME GOOD THINKING...IMO ..AND YES 68 WAS SUCH A TRAGIC TERRIBLE YEAR FOR SO VERY MANY, SOME PERSONALLY AS WELL AS NATIONALLY AND NOTHING HAS BEEN THE SAME AGAIN......THANKS FOR THE COME BACK B...
Don't forget that Castro wasn't assassinated, JFK and RFK were, and the JFK Library is administered by the National Archives and Records Administration, and JFK and RFK aren't with holding the records, the government is.
It isn't the Hemingway plot that led to JFK's murder, it was the plots associated with the 1963 maritime operations, which were approved by JFK, and operationally exposed to RFK so he would know that what happened at Dealey Plaza was a direct result of these plots.
These are aspects of the Valkyrie plot to kill Hitler that were adapted to be used against Castro, but were redirected to JFK.
Who were the people in the US government behind the contingency plans for a coup ion Cuba? Lansdale, Harvey, Des Fitzgerald, Halpern, Haig and Califano, the same guys who say that they were plotting to kill Castro on orders of RFK.
It wasn't Castro who retaliated against JFK, as Russo and the above would like you to believe, and it wasn't the Mafia who hijacked the plot and redirected it from Castro to JFK (as Waldron puts it), it was those within the US government who were responsible for the plots to kill Castro and adapted the Valkyrie plot who did it.
And I do believe the relevant evidence is in the hidden records, but it isn't the Kennedys who are with holding the records, its the US government.
BK
Steve.
There should be legitimate concerns that all of the government records concerning the JFK assassination are not released, as called for by the JFK Act. That's why we are trying to get Congressional oversight hearings, during which the issue of RFK records at the Kennedy Library can be addressed.
Certainly when the Assassination Records Review Board held public hearings in Boston, the subject of those records came up, and Gus Russo and David Corn and Lamar Waldron and those who have a thing about RFK should rightfully seek those records.
RFK's daily appointments book for the entire year of 1963 is missing.
Corn, Russo, Waldron and company (Haig, Halpern, Califano) have been saying for years that RFK approved plans to kill Castro, yet there is no records of this, and if the Lansdal memo on Mary Hemingway and Castro meeting at the Hemingway home in Cuba is the only such record, then I'm not convinced.
These people who claim that Castro was behind the murder of JFK are the same people who claim JFK and RFK ordered Castro's assassination.
JFK and RFK are dead, and Castro is still alive.
The whole reason behind their crusade to establish that JFK/RFK ordered Castro killed is to establish the motive behind the President's assassination.
Once you come to beleive that JFK wanted Castro killed, then it's okay to believe there was a conspiracy to kill JFK, and that plots to kill Castro were connected to the murder of the President, and that in the end, JFK desereved to die.
In fact, they are telling us, okay, we killed the son of a bitch and he deserved it.
I'm reading Russo's Brothers in Arms and Waldron's Legacy of Secrecy, and they are the major themes of both books - JFK and RFK wanted Castro killed and they were both killed because they played that game.
Don't you find it peculiar that the same guys who claim Castro killed JFK are the ones who also claim RFK ordered them to kill Castro?
But JFK is the one who ends up being killed, and they point fingers at Oswald, Castro and the Mafia, but not at the CIA/DIA Task Force that was behind the "Contingency Plans for a coup in Cuba" and the plots to kill Castro.
It's simply not true that JFK or RFK approved any specific plot to kill Castro, which is far different than considering some unmentioned action knowing that Castro would visit Hemingway's home, an action that couldn't be anything else other than "knocking him off."
Nor is it true that the records still being withheld for reasons of national security are being with held by the Kennedy family. Confirm this with the Kennedy Library or the NARA, don't take my word for it. Ask them for the records that are being with held and ask who is with holding them?
The President's Executive Order on Presidential Papers of Jan. 21 makes it clear who controls such records, and its not the Kennedys or Bush families.
They (Russo, Corn et al) want you to believe that RFK had his brother killed, and the Kennedys are still withholding the records that confirm this fact.
You want to believe that, go ahead.
I believe that those who maintain the cover story that Castro was behind JFK's assassination, are the real culprets, and the records we have today and the ones still being with held will support this thesis.
BK
JD "...Of course RFK held the special priviledge of likely being a person who would get into a position to activate a proper investigation."
Not if you believe Russo, or Waldron, or Corn, or Haig, Halpern and Califano.
Russo claims that RFK and LBJ conspired to keep the "Cuban connection" secret so his - RFK's role in the Castro plots and his brother's death was not revealed.
According to Russo, RFK are still supressing the records.
We have enough records open now to know that blaming Castro was written into the plot to kill JFK before 11/22/63, and that those who still blame Castro for Dealey Plaza are the suspects in his murder.
BK
The message is ready to be sent with the following file or link attachments:
Shortcut to: http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=10701&st=15&start=15