22-12-2009, 06:25 AM
Jack,
Allen had posted that Mainman was not Conein even before he had seen any proof. A note sent by Frank Caplett was good enough for him. Why?
When I asked what was going on, Caplett responded with the story about this guy who was supposed to have been given a plaque and all that.
It doesn't take an expert to see this plaque was a fake. So why is somebody faking a plaque to make it look as though Adams was Mainman?
Once I had sent you the photos and you had begun producing proofs of their differences, a rational mind would have qualified its position.
That, however, has not been Eaglesham's modus operandi. Instead, he has dug in his position and simply ignored your informative proofs.
Maybe others are willing to tolerate this kind of abuse of logic and evidence, but I am not. We are engaged in research on a crucial matter.
Notice that -- to the bitter end -- he is asserting that Adams is a "dead ringer" for Mainman or even Conein, when that is clearly false.
I don't know what to say. He is either not as competent as we have assumed or he is not as sincere as we all thought. Too bad either way.
Jim
Allen had posted that Mainman was not Conein even before he had seen any proof. A note sent by Frank Caplett was good enough for him. Why?
When I asked what was going on, Caplett responded with the story about this guy who was supposed to have been given a plaque and all that.
It doesn't take an expert to see this plaque was a fake. So why is somebody faking a plaque to make it look as though Adams was Mainman?
Once I had sent you the photos and you had begun producing proofs of their differences, a rational mind would have qualified its position.
That, however, has not been Eaglesham's modus operandi. Instead, he has dug in his position and simply ignored your informative proofs.
Maybe others are willing to tolerate this kind of abuse of logic and evidence, but I am not. We are engaged in research on a crucial matter.
Notice that -- to the bitter end -- he is asserting that Adams is a "dead ringer" for Mainman or even Conein, when that is clearly false.
I don't know what to say. He is either not as competent as we have assumed or he is not as sincere as we all thought. Too bad either way.
Jim