01-10-2008, 02:34 AM
Charles Drago Wrote:Myra,
On the contrary: There was nothing but "continuity" -- or connective tissue -- between the Chicago and Dallas theatrics.
I contend that the Chicago plot (in the literary as well as literal sense), including Vallee with his mind-blowing LHO parallels, the alleged Cuban rifle team, etc. was initiated by the real Dallas assassins for two main reasons:
-- Once the plot was foiled, all previous chatter about just such an attempt on JFK's life would be thought to refer to the Chicago hit and thus sent to the "No Further Cause for Alarm" file (JFK himself, shortly before he was whacked and after Chicago, reassured someone close to him that the Secret Service had "taken care of" the threat).
...
Well I must admit that this doesn't click for me, the concept of justifying a decrease in security after a foiled plot rather than an increase in security.
Back to the Oswald frame though, it seems clear that he was given cover as both a right and left winger, pro and anti Castro, pro and anti Russia, etc so that the official story could be malleable. David Atlee Phillips, or whoever handled the retroactive narrative, had puzzle pieces that could be assembled to create more than one picture.
I wonder if supposed Chicago patsy Thomas Vallee was also given right and left wing cover stories so that he could be a one size fits all patsy like Oswald.