06-01-2010, 10:53 AM
Adrian cites the passage Charles' comment immediately elicited, from page 52.
Fonzi returns to Salandria on 404:
There are those, such as Vincent Salandria, who contend that studying Kennedy's assassination has to go beyond microanalysis of the evidence because the evidence so early and clearly shouted conspiracy. What's needed now, Salandria says, is what he calls a model of explanation that
would fit both the rationale for a blatant conspiracy as well as its aftermath. And Salandria sees as part of that aftermath the domestic turmoil of the Sixties as well as the militarization of foreign policy that produced both the tragedy of Vietnam and, in the decades that followed, the arrogant, worldwide proliferation of illegal covert operations by the intelligence agencies. Salandria believes that for a conspiracy to fit that model of explanation, it must incorporate "forces positioned in the highest echelons of the Federal Government."
The film of Abraham Zapruder et al is not the moon, and may not even be the finger pointing at the moon. It may be those attorneys in the second floor windows of Justice at the Nixon Counterinnaugural January 19, 1969, giving us the finger and mooning us.
Coup, coup, ca-chew.
Yes, and it appears more and more likely that the film was altered to conceal that which we know to have occurred.
And it is another golden apple dropped by the Dianagangers who did the deed.
Fonzi returns to Salandria on 404:
There are those, such as Vincent Salandria, who contend that studying Kennedy's assassination has to go beyond microanalysis of the evidence because the evidence so early and clearly shouted conspiracy. What's needed now, Salandria says, is what he calls a model of explanation that
would fit both the rationale for a blatant conspiracy as well as its aftermath. And Salandria sees as part of that aftermath the domestic turmoil of the Sixties as well as the militarization of foreign policy that produced both the tragedy of Vietnam and, in the decades that followed, the arrogant, worldwide proliferation of illegal covert operations by the intelligence agencies. Salandria believes that for a conspiracy to fit that model of explanation, it must incorporate "forces positioned in the highest echelons of the Federal Government."
The film of Abraham Zapruder et al is not the moon, and may not even be the finger pointing at the moon. It may be those attorneys in the second floor windows of Justice at the Nixon Counterinnaugural January 19, 1969, giving us the finger and mooning us.
Coup, coup, ca-chew.
Yes, and it appears more and more likely that the film was altered to conceal that which we know to have occurred.
And it is another golden apple dropped by the Dianagangers who did the deed.