Celluloid Doppelganger: Why the Zapruder Film's Authenticity Can Be Argued

[Jack White]

Jack,

I feel privileged to be able to participate in a forum such as this which hosts first-generation researchers to the events of 11/22/63. As such, you are a great asset to this forum. Reading things here, plebes like me are getting a Master's level course in the real-world from generous people like you.

You and Charles Drago have been posting entries in this thread about the JFK murder that are way, way beyond what we get in books we can order from Amazon. To me it's like investment bankers arguing the nuances of derivatives of derivatives. It is becoming way beyond complicated. I just spent a whole evening noodling on your fine video about how the Zapruder film was faked...What a mind-blower.

And then, on the Education Forum, I saw a posting where you say the Moon landing is a hoax.

http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index....opic=15319

You are a respected photo interpreter, and the points you made and the research you did on the Zapruder film is incredibly convincing. Because of that, this is the first time in my life that I am giving any credence to any claim that the Moon landing might indeed be faked.

Can you point me to a set of evidence similar to your work on the film in Dealey Plaza that shows Neil Armstrong was actually in a studio?

I would very much appreciate the help.

Best,
Bruce

Thanks for your interest and kind words, Bruce.

First a minor correction. I am not a FIRST generation researcher
and am barely a SECOND generation researcher.

However, I started investigating the case on November 24, 1963 and
have not stopped.

Thanks for your interest in the faked photos of the alleged Apollo
missions. I am not sure how to answer your questions except to
refer you to my websites:

http://www.aulis.com/jackstudies_index1.html

http://www.aulis.com/skeleton.htm

Check them out and report your impressions to us.

Thanks.

Jack