01-03-2010, 12:18 AM
Charles Drago Wrote:Dawn, et al,
Alas, we remain enmeshed in the process of elimination.
This tried and true investigatory method undoubtedly will help us -- as the late Larry Gelbart put it -- to get to the bottom of this case no matter how high it takes us.
One need not name the Sponsors in order to eliminate suspects.
Nor should one feel obliged to name the Sponsors prematurely in order to justify one's methods.
I could offer best guesses, but to do so at the current stage of the investigation would, I think, be counter-productive to our efforts.
I know Sherlock Holmes made the process of elimination famous, and its probably the most logical course to follow. However, Sherlock and Watson usually had all the evidence and suspects laid out in front of them. They usually didn't have to contend with the deliberate destruction of evidence, planted evidence, witnesses being murdered, obstruction by Government, CIA, FBI, the media etc, etc.
Many who were considered suspects have already been effectively eliminated. These include Castro and the Soviets.
No-one has effectively refuted Zionist Israel's standing as a prime suspect, because it's practically irrefutable.
A few years ago, most in the research community were too chickenshit to even face the possibility that JFK's death might have been sponsored (or co-sponsored) by a nation many believed was a trusted and favored ally. The subject was taboo or quickly squelched. Fortunately, this appears to be changing, although the climate of fear still exists, due mainly to the preponderance of highly placed and seemingly patriotic Americans whose primary loyalty is actually to Israel, not America.