07-03-2010, 11:39 PM
Dawn,
I am going to transfer the material from Judyth to this forum when I can catch my breathe. My only point in comparing the books is that they are both massive and detailed. Therefore, that one of them is massive and detailed no more proves its reliability in the one case than the other. I was a bit surprised that Jack thought I was dismissing it as worthless.
I featured John Armstrong in "The Death of JFK" conference I held in Minneapolis in 1999, which I used as a basis for composing MURDER IN DEALEY PLAZA (2000) by inviting speakers to submit their material in the form of a chapter. What Armstrong sent me was virtually incoherent and I was not in the position to undertake some Herculean effort to shape it up.
According to Judyth, John spoke with her exactly once and dismissed her on the basis of a faulty inference about passing for Marina when Marina was pregnant. Like you, I have found Judyth to be incredibly open and forthcoming as well as better at presenting her case than any of those who oppose her are at presenting theirs. I continue to support her strongly.
Jim
I am going to transfer the material from Judyth to this forum when I can catch my breathe. My only point in comparing the books is that they are both massive and detailed. Therefore, that one of them is massive and detailed no more proves its reliability in the one case than the other. I was a bit surprised that Jack thought I was dismissing it as worthless.
I featured John Armstrong in "The Death of JFK" conference I held in Minneapolis in 1999, which I used as a basis for composing MURDER IN DEALEY PLAZA (2000) by inviting speakers to submit their material in the form of a chapter. What Armstrong sent me was virtually incoherent and I was not in the position to undertake some Herculean effort to shape it up.
According to Judyth, John spoke with her exactly once and dismissed her on the basis of a faulty inference about passing for Marina when Marina was pregnant. Like you, I have found Judyth to be incredibly open and forthcoming as well as better at presenting her case than any of those who oppose her are at presenting theirs. I continue to support her strongly.
Jim
Dawn Meredith Wrote:Jim: I am following the exchanges between you and Jack and others on the thread of this same name over at EF. Instead of arguing with Jack about Armstrong PLEASE go to The Last Hurrah and order Harvery and Lee. As Jack has said now repeatedly you cannot just pick out a few things from Armstrong's book as proof, it is the overall evidence and it is MASSIVE. Tedious in places because of the thoroughness of his research. All the time you have wasted arging with Jack over this you could have read the book. As you know I am not a detractor of Judyth's but I must say I do have some questions based on this book. However I am aware of her recent terrible loss of her best friend and have no intention of asking these questions at the moment.
I was also one of the people to whom Armstrong said he did not believe Judyth at COPA. But I have corresponded with Judyth for years and have always found her to be honest, forthright and able to supply ample evidence for her claims. So I listened to what John had to say, then found Andy and bought John's book. You cannot possibly understand the Oswald part of this case without reading this remarkable book. And please cease comparing it to Bugliosi's pack of lies. Just because both books are lengthy, all similarity ends there.
Respectfully,
Dawn