08-03-2010, 08:52 PM
Judyth's preliminary response to Jack White about "the two Oswalds":
Wish I had Armstrong's book--that's the crux of the problem...I only have quotes....but even from the quotes, I can provide information and will try to assemble some more.
Jack White says Armstrong's book is full of plenty of stuff.
He says Armstrong 'researched' me...a few emails and perhaps one phone call...told Sydney and others that because I was not pregnant in New Orleans, I could not have posed as marina--even though at one point I tried to use a pillow, yes, I did.
He told people at Copa that because I said I was not pregnant, he dismissed everything I had to say after that.
Since I 'could not' have posed as Marina Oswald, even though she was sequestered and only went to the local library and food stores, twice to Pontchatrain Beach, and was in the French quarter only with Ruth Paine, not accompanied by Lee...as we had been there quite a few times, I believe that's why he stayed behind. The excursion to the French quarter with Ruth Paine just before they left for Texas--and Lee went off to Mexico City--is described in plenty of detail.
Armstrong never gave me a chance, and Jack should look into Armstrong's book to see if there is a single reference to me in the entire enormous book--if only to dismiss what I had to say, there should be something.
I will be happy to provide a long list of objections. Then you'll see why DellaRosa simply erased everything I wrote.
It will take some time, because I am tired from weeping over loss of Martha and have one final chapter in our book to finish for Laura. Martha would want me to finish the book we nearly had completed when she died. I am going to do that translation work tonight...
I will send more information tomorrow or Tuesday on "the two Oswalds".
Meanwhile, I attach more files of interest:
1) 1963 National Institutes of Health published their report on activities they funded. Please note the items regarding viruses and cancer. The bioweapon project was supported by NIH research, funds and personnel in many peripheral aspects, some of which are evident on this page of the report.
2) a-1 employment showing Lee's May 15 visit...a-1 check front and back...I used "Mrs. Robert A. Baker, III" to hide my name, but the account was under 'Judy Baker' so that was written on the back.
I also have bank statement, but that is also connected with the American Express matter...It all happened in the same bank statement. I also have the a-1 fine print blown up showing they were supposed to take much more than what the a-1 check is for. Lee got the amount reduced tremendously so I'd have money for food, etc. As my new husband really had let me down--he was unable to be reached and was out of town for weeks, without leaving even his phone number where he could be reached in an emergency. Lee helped me many ways that summer while I was virtually abandoned for weeks at a time...
[quote name='Jack White' post='185978' date='Mar 7 2010, 06:30 PM']Amazing.
I find it interesting that though JVB says her new husband left her "immediately" after
their marriage she somehow (not explained) was able to conceive 5 beautiful children
by someone. Mr. Baker is very conspicuous by his absence in her stories.
Thanks to whomever accumulated all these quotes, sayings, non-sayings, rebuttals, excuses,
etc. which I had never seen. They are helpful in trying to understand this strange hiccup
in the JFK case.
I wish that included had been the JVB responses to the 12 years of documented research
by John Armstrong showing that two different persons (or more) used the name "Lee
Harvey Oswald". As I recall, her reply was that there was only ONE Oswald..."LEE".
According to Armstrong's documentation, the LHO who worked at Reily Coffee Company
was not Lee, but HARVEY. I guess "Lee" withheld that secret from her.[/quote]
Wish I had Armstrong's book--that's the crux of the problem...I only have quotes....but even from the quotes, I can provide information and will try to assemble some more.
Jack White says Armstrong's book is full of plenty of stuff.
He says Armstrong 'researched' me...a few emails and perhaps one phone call...told Sydney and others that because I was not pregnant in New Orleans, I could not have posed as marina--even though at one point I tried to use a pillow, yes, I did.
He told people at Copa that because I said I was not pregnant, he dismissed everything I had to say after that.
Since I 'could not' have posed as Marina Oswald, even though she was sequestered and only went to the local library and food stores, twice to Pontchatrain Beach, and was in the French quarter only with Ruth Paine, not accompanied by Lee...as we had been there quite a few times, I believe that's why he stayed behind. The excursion to the French quarter with Ruth Paine just before they left for Texas--and Lee went off to Mexico City--is described in plenty of detail.
Armstrong never gave me a chance, and Jack should look into Armstrong's book to see if there is a single reference to me in the entire enormous book--if only to dismiss what I had to say, there should be something.
I will be happy to provide a long list of objections. Then you'll see why DellaRosa simply erased everything I wrote.
It will take some time, because I am tired from weeping over loss of Martha and have one final chapter in our book to finish for Laura. Martha would want me to finish the book we nearly had completed when she died. I am going to do that translation work tonight...
I will send more information tomorrow or Tuesday on "the two Oswalds".
Meanwhile, I attach more files of interest:
1) 1963 National Institutes of Health published their report on activities they funded. Please note the items regarding viruses and cancer. The bioweapon project was supported by NIH research, funds and personnel in many peripheral aspects, some of which are evident on this page of the report.
2) a-1 employment showing Lee's May 15 visit...a-1 check front and back...I used "Mrs. Robert A. Baker, III" to hide my name, but the account was under 'Judy Baker' so that was written on the back.
I also have bank statement, but that is also connected with the American Express matter...It all happened in the same bank statement. I also have the a-1 fine print blown up showing they were supposed to take much more than what the a-1 check is for. Lee got the amount reduced tremendously so I'd have money for food, etc. As my new husband really had let me down--he was unable to be reached and was out of town for weeks, without leaving even his phone number where he could be reached in an emergency. Lee helped me many ways that summer while I was virtually abandoned for weeks at a time...
[quote name='Jack White' post='185978' date='Mar 7 2010, 06:30 PM']Amazing.
I find it interesting that though JVB says her new husband left her "immediately" after
their marriage she somehow (not explained) was able to conceive 5 beautiful children
by someone. Mr. Baker is very conspicuous by his absence in her stories.
Thanks to whomever accumulated all these quotes, sayings, non-sayings, rebuttals, excuses,
etc. which I had never seen. They are helpful in trying to understand this strange hiccup
in the JFK case.
I wish that included had been the JVB responses to the 12 years of documented research
by John Armstrong showing that two different persons (or more) used the name "Lee
Harvey Oswald". As I recall, her reply was that there was only ONE Oswald..."LEE".
According to Armstrong's documentation, the LHO who worked at Reily Coffee Company
was not Lee, but HARVEY. I guess "Lee" withheld that secret from her.[/quote]