12-03-2010, 08:21 PM
(This post was last modified: 12-03-2010, 08:23 PM by Jan Klimkowski.)
Quote:Princess Diana died after attempts to frighten her into dumping Dodi al Fayed and ending her anti-establishment activities went horribly wrong, a leading lawyer has claimed.
Michael Mansfield claimed he was sure Diana's 'killers' had no intention of ending her life in a Paris tunnel in August 1997 and simply wanted to scare her.
For me, this smells of either red herring or limited hangout.
What is Mansfield claiming? That there was an intelligence plot to have paparazzi pursue Diana aggressively through Paris and she would be so in fear of her life that she would stop spilling the beans about the Royal Family and abandon her landmine campaign?
It makes no sense to me.
Henri Paul was a British intelligence asset, but what was his role in this plot? To turn round to Diana and say: "Shut it or you die?"
How could a high-speed paparazzi chase though Paris achieve anything other than exacerbating Diana's extant love/hate relationship with those very paparazzi whom she alternately courted and fled from during her entire life?
"It means this War was never political at all, the politics was all theatre, all just to keep the people distracted...."
"Proverbs for Paranoids 4: You hide, They seek."
"They are in Love. Fuck the War."
Gravity's Rainbow, Thomas Pynchon
"Ccollanan Pachacamac ricuy auccacunac yahuarniy hichascancuta."
The last words of the last Inka, Tupac Amaru, led to the gallows by men of god & dogs of war
"Proverbs for Paranoids 4: You hide, They seek."
"They are in Love. Fuck the War."
Gravity's Rainbow, Thomas Pynchon
"Ccollanan Pachacamac ricuy auccacunac yahuarniy hichascancuta."
The last words of the last Inka, Tupac Amaru, led to the gallows by men of god & dogs of war