Just Was Removed By Walker On Other Forum

[Magda Hassan]

Hi Terry! The woman is Xxxxxx Xxxx. It wasn't rocket science to work it out. We all know it is not any of the women from JFK or Political Conspiracies. We all know Peter, some for many years, and we all know what he does and doesn't do. We know he is not a sexual harasser. I have gone on the record at the EF to say Peter has never been known to act as such and I have certainly never been at the receiving end of it from him. Frustratingly, Peter has never uttered her name to me, despite my demands, as he is too much of the gentleman to do so but I have had it conformed from Xxxxxx herself that it is her. I have been in communication with her and encouraged her to go public. Either to stand by her original claims of sexual harassment or to say there was no basis in them to clear Peter. Peter has all the emails from her and the photos of herself she sent him. He sent her a photo of himself and his dog, as he would. The same one which he uses on the Ed Forum before all his posts and details were deleted.
At this stage it seems she has not the strength of character to go public and either stand by her original charges or to stand by Peter and say they were unfounded. She seems to be reacting defensively and abandoning any responsibility for the situation claiming that it wasn't her that asked Walker to ban him etc. But it seems to me her inaction is akin to some one walking away from a train wreck and saying "Well, I wasn't the driver and it wasn't my fault" and then feeling no moral obligation or basic human decency to help the maimed and injured in this totally unnecessary train wreck or even to bother to call an ambulance. Which I find really sad. Perhaps she doesn't realise the gravity of a ruined reputation in the age of Google. All of this will seriously impact on Peter's future employment and dating prospects.

In any case she said that there was nothing to what Peter said. It was a misunderstanding which is what Peter always said. As she said to me she has no ill-will towards him. But others do and I think that xxxxxx's unfounded original complaint has been used like a club by others to hit him hard and where it hurts most. Then his defense is denied him. All posts disappeared and Peter accused of 'paranoia' of all things, his mental heath questioned on the forum, as if there wasn't some set up to get rid of him when we all saw it played out before our eyes. And not an apology public or private.