14-03-2010, 07:42 PM
[quote=Jack White]Jim...Armstrong and a British researcher that John hired to help
spent months in the National Archives. They requested and copied
EVERY document which mentioned Oswald or any member of the
Oswald family. All of these documents were gathered into more than
100 4-inch 3-ring binders by subject and arranged according to date.
In addition John examined public records anywhere referenced in the
documents...and conducted hundreds of interviews of persons mentioned
in any documents.
The most crucial of these (as you will find when you read the book)
was a man named Palmer McBride, a man who worked with Lee Harvey
Oswald in New Orleans while official records showed that Lee Harvey
Oswald was in Japan.
John's book then shows that most other documents were contradictory
when compared. What emerged was two different timelines for two
different men on the same dates...a physical impossibility.
As you say, forged documents are commonplace...BUT NOT ONES
WHICH CONTRADICT EACH OTHER and raise questions. Forged
documents would NOT be created WHICH SHOW TWO OSWALDS,
BUT JUST THE OPPOSITE. At all costs, they would HIDE any evidence
of two Oswalds.
When you read the book, you will see that contrary to developing
theories, John shows evidence of two LHOs in two places at the
same time. The evidence is overwhelming.
Jack
Jim:
At the point of beating this drum too many times I have to say again, just give Andy a call and get a copy of Harvey and Lee for both yourself and Judyth. All this time Judyth wastes countering the posts about her could be spend so much more productively. I too believe whe is the real deal and that her only mission in all of this is to clear Lee's name. In order for her to do do, and for you to continue to defend her story and Lee's story is to have the facts. I used to think that going down the Lee Harvey Oswald road was one of those areas too riddled in disinfo to be ever understood. Armstrong just lays it all out. It is documents, not opinion. Proof of two seperate individuals. Living at times very near to each other. Witness after witness who knew "Lee" described the same person: quick tempered, not given to talks of Marxism, never uttering a word of Russian, while witness after witness who knew "Harvey" describe a mild mannered man, not given to fights, very taken with the intellectual concepts of Marxism, perfect Russian...They are two distinct people. PLEASE read the book. You are doing Judyth no favors trying to refute Armstrong and Judyth is making her case far weaker doing the same. In the past she always followed the evidence. Not argued against it. I understand she feels slighted by Armstrong. All the more reason to do the reading that took him TWELVE years of his life to research.
Dawn
spent months in the National Archives. They requested and copied
EVERY document which mentioned Oswald or any member of the
Oswald family. All of these documents were gathered into more than
100 4-inch 3-ring binders by subject and arranged according to date.
In addition John examined public records anywhere referenced in the
documents...and conducted hundreds of interviews of persons mentioned
in any documents.
The most crucial of these (as you will find when you read the book)
was a man named Palmer McBride, a man who worked with Lee Harvey
Oswald in New Orleans while official records showed that Lee Harvey
Oswald was in Japan.
John's book then shows that most other documents were contradictory
when compared. What emerged was two different timelines for two
different men on the same dates...a physical impossibility.
As you say, forged documents are commonplace...BUT NOT ONES
WHICH CONTRADICT EACH OTHER and raise questions. Forged
documents would NOT be created WHICH SHOW TWO OSWALDS,
BUT JUST THE OPPOSITE. At all costs, they would HIDE any evidence
of two Oswalds.
When you read the book, you will see that contrary to developing
theories, John shows evidence of two LHOs in two places at the
same time. The evidence is overwhelming.
Jack
Jim:
At the point of beating this drum too many times I have to say again, just give Andy a call and get a copy of Harvey and Lee for both yourself and Judyth. All this time Judyth wastes countering the posts about her could be spend so much more productively. I too believe whe is the real deal and that her only mission in all of this is to clear Lee's name. In order for her to do do, and for you to continue to defend her story and Lee's story is to have the facts. I used to think that going down the Lee Harvey Oswald road was one of those areas too riddled in disinfo to be ever understood. Armstrong just lays it all out. It is documents, not opinion. Proof of two seperate individuals. Living at times very near to each other. Witness after witness who knew "Lee" described the same person: quick tempered, not given to talks of Marxism, never uttering a word of Russian, while witness after witness who knew "Harvey" describe a mild mannered man, not given to fights, very taken with the intellectual concepts of Marxism, perfect Russian...They are two distinct people. PLEASE read the book. You are doing Judyth no favors trying to refute Armstrong and Judyth is making her case far weaker doing the same. In the past she always followed the evidence. Not argued against it. I understand she feels slighted by Armstrong. All the more reason to do the reading that took him TWELVE years of his life to research.
Dawn