Just Was Removed By Walker On Other Forum

[David Guyatt]

I have just seen the 'offending' email and some of the following ones. As far as I can see it is all a storm in a 'c' cup. There is nothing to them. Nothing to take offense at and no sign of offense taken. Peter has been wrongly accused of a serious matter and not permitted to defend himself. His entirely understandable and justifiable reaction this false charge of cyber sexual predation and the whispering campaign against him by some was also used against him and there were questions raised about his mental health by the resident quacks and fruit loops. Methinks there is far more fertile pasture elsewhere in that lunatic asylum called the EF if looking for members with mental health issues. In addition to this slander and libel on Peter's character he has had to endure the intellectual theft and vandalism of all his posts contemptuously and vindictively being disappeared. This to me is not just an attack on Peter but on all the members. I do hope that the administrators will find enough decency somewhere with in them to at least send, electronically or otherwise, the disappeared posts to Peter so that he may have them even if they don't want them. It would also be the right thing for them to apologize to Peter for what he has had to endure from them, and to publicly retract their allegations.

Actually Magda, the multi-part construct that posts under the Colby login, says that the sex pest angle was not the cause of Peter's summary execution. And he seems to be really plugged in over there, despite having no apparent official function or office.

You remember the execution don't you? It was followed by a show trial thread that didn't present any charges but which was soon disappeared from history. There's nothing like historians to know and appreciate the great value expunged history can provide in a pinch. Anyway, the deleted show trial thread was followed by a protest thread, about the show trial. But that has also now been expunged. And now we are left with a protest-protest thread that sees anyone who posts on Peter's behalf instantly placed on permanent moderation or summarily expelled. That thread has now been sat on hard by a squat, rusted, immovable T37 Soviet era mean-son-of-a-bitch tank that cannot and will not budge.

But to return to my point. Peter's banishment and being made an unperson was not about him being a sex pest, says informed insider construct, Colby. And by golly I do think he is right on this occasion. I have no idea why Peter was banished, T37's explanations not with-standing.

But there are a few canny eyes over there at least.

The following is from one of the disappeared threads:

Michael Hogan
Today, 06:43 AM
Post #13

[COLOR="DarkOrchid"]QUOTE (William Kelly @ Mar 6 2010, 10:45 PM)
And where are the other moderators when Len Colby uses words like "bullshit" and "assholes" when this is supposed to be an educational forum for educators and students?[/COLOR]

Why isn't he on moderation?

In an obvious reference to Peter Lemkin, Colby used the term "insane assholes." The words have since been stricken:

http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index....t&p=185668

From the same thread, which was actually a new member's biographical page; Contrast this with Walker's failure to address Colby's odious remarks. Walker's biases are transparent and they are ugly:


[COLOR="Green"]QUOTE (Peter Lemkin @ Mar 3 2010, 10:47 PM)
Beware the tricksters here, unlike at Rich's, they are tolerated here and number more than one.[/COLOR]

QUOTE (Andy Walker @ Mar 3 2010, 05:10 PM)
[COLOR="Navy"]Now this is certainly not an appropriate comment for a moderator. I invite peter Lemkin to withdraw it.
[/COLOR]
And in a remarkably prescient comment a few weeks ago:

[COLOR="Red"](Len Colby @ Feb 22 2010, 02:06 PM)
Another inappropriate personal attack from Lemkin who should be on moderation rather than serve as a moderator.
[/COLOR]

Andy Walker accommodated Colby on both counts.

What do you think? Could it really be that odiously simple? That Standard History man leapt over the trench in a blood rage over such an innocuous statement, namely "beware the tricksters here", to protect his best mate the "Smoking Man" construct?



It seems almost too ridiculous to even consider doesn't it.

But maybe...