20-03-2010, 12:29 AM
Until he mentioned Eustace Mullens, I had never heard of him. So I would not be citing him as a source, either. But with so much material here that is of such extraordinary interest, why are you so fixated upon trivialities? Don't answer, because I really don't want to know. If you have better things to do, then spend your time on other threads.
Adrian Mack Wrote:Quote:Now as far as Eustace Mullens. Even a researcher who is far to the right or disrespected by some can still be correct in some of his ideas, like his view that there was collaboration between medicine, big pharma, and the cancer association to keep from finding a cancer cure. That must be individually researched and evaluated on its own merit.I could get the same news from the Church of Scientology, but would I use it as a source?