20-03-2010, 04:15 AM
Quote:If you'll forgive me for saying so, and with no disrespect to you personally, I think it is you who are struggling with the apparent conflict that interconnectedness is the reality of the world in which we live.
Compartmenting subjects is completely understandable.
In the last analysis none of us really wishes or wants to digest the indigestible.
But this is exactly what we must do if we are to have any meaningful impact on our world as it is currently configured.
I'm as sorry about this as you are.
[size=12]Thanks David. I'm not making myself clear. [/SIZE]
I understand the interconnectedness of Deep Politics. But we need to exercise discernment.
Let me put it this way: Dr. Fetzer has acted as a conduit for Baker’s material, which deserves to be assessed on its own merits.
Instead, he’s introduced an anonymous “expert” whose fatuous appeals to authority are so questionable that even Fetzer is backpeddling now.
So what was the point? And how does that help Baker?
And why is Fetzer still making statements about Armstrong’s book before he’s read it?