21-03-2010, 02:46 AM
Quote:NOTE: My psy ops expert has sent me a note apologizing for referrring to Eustice Mullens. He explained that he had done so because Mullins had suggested the hypothesis of "a conspiracy between medicine, big pharma and the cancer society to keep cancer a profitable business. I never argued that his statement was correct or that he was a good person or anything else about him." I would post it but I do not want to distract attention from more important issues.Dr. Fetzer, do you understand that your expert has precisely zero authority at this point?
Did he hope to float this little Trojan horse into mix unchallenged?
If he "never argued that his statement was correct or that he was a good person or anything else about him", then why in God's name even bring Eustace Mullens up? Really?
Also, correct me if I'm wrong (sincerely), but has Judyth Baker at any point claimed specifically that her harassment is due to "a conspiracy between medicine, big pharma and the cancer society to keep cancer a profitable business"...?
Because if she hasn't, then Baker's attempts to clarify her situation are now saddled with an unprovable hypothesis provided by an anonymous source who then associated his unprovable hypothesis with somebody well known for hate speech. Until he was called out for it, that is.
Judyth must be tickled pink.