Judyth Vary Baker: Living in Exile

[Jan Klimkowski]

When an Adrian Mack has such an obvious agenda to subvert an historic thread on a forum that was founded, in large measure, to exclude hacks, shills, and trolls, it baffles me that he should be given such a wide latitude to practice his skills.

Jim - unfortunately this thread began with a major attack on Judyth by a hugely experienced researcher and a long-time collaborator of your good self: one Jack White.

Jack accused Judyth of having Munchausens Syndrome, and was moderated by DPF for this claim which is both against forum rules and which is beyond his area of expertise and competence. Jack then wrote as follows:

This whole thread is irrelevant
and only diverts attention away from more important matters.
I don't care about JVB at all.

Edited by the moderators to comply with forum rules.

, in my opinion...IF I am allowed to
have an opinion.

Jack

However, the thread was then continued by its protagonists in a combative fashion.

It is inevitable that sometimes the tone of a thread will be set by its major participants. In such circumstances, moderation is inappropriate until forum rules have been clearly breached.

Adrian Mack, I am convinced, is not seeking the truth and does not have Judyth's best interests at heart. It is obvious to me that he has an agenda that is contrary to the aims and objectives of this thread and of this forum.

All participants in this thread should stick to exploring Judyth's claims and evaluating them according to evidence which can substantiate or damage those claims. This includes third party participants such as the anonymous "psy ops expert", whose views are being posted here without he or she being identified.

Personally, I look forward to hearing Judyth's interpretations of some of John Armstrong's painstakingly gathered material, now that she has access to it. Judyth's observations in turn could then be evaulated, fairly and rigorously, by other researchers with expertise and knowledge in this area. Others, including Judyth, could respond.

And so the fundamentally crucial dialectic of research continues.

However, DPF will not tolerate accusations made without evidence such as, for instance, the claim that a potentially key witness has a psychological condition, or that an area of research is irrelevant. If a researcher considers subject x irrelevant, he or she is free to ignore it.