21-03-2010, 07:28 PM
(This post was last modified: 21-03-2010, 07:38 PM by James H. Fetzer.)
Adrian,
We have a subject of great interest, Judyth Vary Baker, who knows a great deal about the accused assassin of JFK. I invited a psy ops expert to take a look at her case. He is not speaking for her, but is talking about her case as part of a pattern typical of intel ops. The phrase, "TI" (targeted individual) is one used by intel ops and those who analyze them. Judyth has reported on the kinds of abuse to which she has been subjected, which is characteristic of TIs. But she wouldn't be expected to use that phrase to describe herself.
It probably had not occurred to Ed Haslam at the time to hypothesize that Judyth might be a target because she poses a threat to big medicine, big pharma, and cancer societies. But after this thread, it would not surprise me at all. I am just the least bit perplexed that you seem to have so much difficulty in sorting out between JUDYTH'S EXPERIENCES and COMMENTS ABOUT JUDYTH'S EXPERIENCES. Maybe that explains what I consider to have been some of the oddities about your posts. Just pay attention to the sources that I cite.
Jim
We have a subject of great interest, Judyth Vary Baker, who knows a great deal about the accused assassin of JFK. I invited a psy ops expert to take a look at her case. He is not speaking for her, but is talking about her case as part of a pattern typical of intel ops. The phrase, "TI" (targeted individual) is one used by intel ops and those who analyze them. Judyth has reported on the kinds of abuse to which she has been subjected, which is characteristic of TIs. But she wouldn't be expected to use that phrase to describe herself.
It probably had not occurred to Ed Haslam at the time to hypothesize that Judyth might be a target because she poses a threat to big medicine, big pharma, and cancer societies. But after this thread, it would not surprise me at all. I am just the least bit perplexed that you seem to have so much difficulty in sorting out between JUDYTH'S EXPERIENCES and COMMENTS ABOUT JUDYTH'S EXPERIENCES. Maybe that explains what I consider to have been some of the oddities about your posts. Just pay attention to the sources that I cite.
Jim
Adrian Mack Wrote:And another observation:
I read Dr. Mary's Monkey a few years ago, so forgive me if my memory is hazy, but Haslam's premise is that the first polio vaccine was contaminated with a monkey virus that caused soft tissue cancers in some recipients. Baker was involved with Ochsner and Dr. Mary Sherman in secretly developing a vaccine while also working on the weaponization of cancer, specifically as part of an anti-Castro operation.
Ed Haslam does NOT suggest a larger collusion in which "big medicine, big pharma, and the cancer society may share an interest in keeping cancer a profitable business", correct?