Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Eurasia
#2
Paul Rigby may be your man here Ed but I know others are as knowledgeable as well. It is all part of the original great Anglo game plan. Not seen in the US media ? :rofl: TANS has some very interesting articles.

FWIW the Soviet Union used to set up industries in various places but other supporting/related parts of that industry would be set up in other regions. This was for various reasons. To distribute the work around being one and to keep a political balance between the republics so that no one place became more powerful than another being another. Each republic would be dependent on others for their development and well being overall. When the SU disintegrated it was catastrophic for all involved because of this set up. In the mean time it has made easy pickings of the former republics by the US and corporate entities to be played off against each other and kept weak to benefit the US and corporate interests involved. Balkanisation. United we stand divided we fall. Divide and Conquer. The Anglos have play that one very well through history and the world.
"The philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it." Karl Marx

"He would, wouldn't he?" Mandy Rice-Davies. When asked in court whether she knew that Lord Astor had denied having sex with her.

“I think it would be a good idea” Ghandi, when asked about Western Civilisation.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Eurasia - by Ed Jewett - 03-04-2010, 03:06 AM
Eurasia - by Magda Hassan - 03-04-2010, 03:34 AM
Eurasia - by Ed Jewett - 03-04-2010, 03:54 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Eurasia: A Geo-political re-alignment Lauren Johnson 153 142,050 05-02-2017, 10:51 PM
Last Post: Paul Rigby
  Towards a New Iron Curtain: The US-NATO Missile Shield Encircles Eurasia Ed Jewett 9 10,602 12-12-2011, 02:00 AM
Last Post: Cliff Logan

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)