23-04-2010, 10:19 PM
My take on the result of the debate was that there were at least three different rifles exclusive of the Moschettieri Del Duce Carcano that were presented at one time or another as THE KILL-SHOT WEAPON. This fact was first established by Jack White and later substanciated by me employing a pixel by pixel analysis of the three rifles. I will refer you to Jerry McCleer's website where I believe that analysis is archived. Also, we were able to determine that at least one version of C2166 is an out and out forgery where the lines of demarkation and the serial numbers are clearly visible and can be easily compared to the original C2166. those comparison photos along with my analysis should also be archived on Jerry's website.
http://jfkresearch.freehomepage.com/
Respectfully:
My take on the result of the debate was that there were at least three different rifles exclusive of the Moschettieri Del Duce Carcano that were presented at one time or another as THE KILL-SHOT WEAPON. This fact was first established by Jack White and later substanciated by me employing a pixel by pixel analysis of the three rifles. I will refer you to Jerry McCleer's website where I believe that analysis is archived. Also, we were able to determine that at least one version of C2166 is an out and out forgery where the lines of demarkation and the serial numbers are clearly visible and can be easily compared to the original C2166. those comparison photos along with my analysis should also be archived on Jerry's website.http://jfkresearch.freehomepage.com/
Respectfully: John Ritchson
http://jfkresearch.freehomepage.com/
Respectfully:
My take on the result of the debate was that there were at least three different rifles exclusive of the Moschettieri Del Duce Carcano that were presented at one time or another as THE KILL-SHOT WEAPON. This fact was first established by Jack White and later substanciated by me employing a pixel by pixel analysis of the three rifles. I will refer you to Jerry McCleer's website where I believe that analysis is archived. Also, we were able to determine that at least one version of C2166 is an out and out forgery where the lines of demarkation and the serial numbers are clearly visible and can be easily compared to the original C2166. those comparison photos along with my analysis should also be archived on Jerry's website.http://jfkresearch.freehomepage.com/
Respectfully: John Ritchson

