26-04-2010, 12:56 AM
Good post, Monk. I case you missed my #1555, which is found on page 104, here is what
I had to say about John Simkin and his remarks in denigration of Gerald Patrick Hemming:
More surprising is that John Simkin would involve himself in this thread for the third or the
fourth time. I was just a bit taken aback by his last intervention, in which he stated--quite
categorically!--that Gerry Hemming is a disinformation agent. Since Hemming has threads
that are archived on this forum and characterizations like that one are supposed to violate
forum rules, I suppose he should have been censored by his own moderators. Others who
know vastly more about the assassination, such as James Richards and Noel Twyman, for
example, have found Hemming to be extremely reliable. The longest chapter in BLOODY
TREASON (1998), for example, is devoted to Hemming. If Hemming had disputed Judyth's
authenticity rather than endorsed it, I imagine he (Simkin) would have said nothing. That
he praises Jack's posts on this forum speaks volumes about his knowledge of this thread.
![[Image: JFKhemming16.jpg]](http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/JFKhemming16.jpg)
[quote name='Greg Burnham' post='190635' date='Apr 24 2010, 01:07 AM']
[quote name='John Simkin' post='190387' date='Apr 21 2010, 11:08 PM']
[quote name='Greg Burnham' post='190386' date='Apr 22 2010, 06:44 AM']
For what it's worth, HEMMING believed her. And HEMMING was a hard case--a difficult man to convince of anything. He was probably tougher than most skeptics could ever be. He wouldn't have asked me to give her the time of day otherwise.[/quote]
Hemming did know a lot but as one CIA insider told me, he was paid by the word. Hemming was one member of the Forum who was a disinformation agent.[/quote]
John,
In all due respect, I wonder if you ever dared to call him a disinfo agent while he was alive? I have literally hundreds of thousands of HEMMING's words--and they didn't cost me a dime. If you had been aware of his meager means you most likely wouldn't have said this. If I described his former living condition as "sub-modest" it would still be a drastic overstatement. HEMMING may have been a lot of things, but he wasn't a snitch and he wasn't for sale. For sure...
[/quote]
I had to say about John Simkin and his remarks in denigration of Gerald Patrick Hemming:
More surprising is that John Simkin would involve himself in this thread for the third or the
fourth time. I was just a bit taken aback by his last intervention, in which he stated--quite
categorically!--that Gerry Hemming is a disinformation agent. Since Hemming has threads
that are archived on this forum and characterizations like that one are supposed to violate
forum rules, I suppose he should have been censored by his own moderators. Others who
know vastly more about the assassination, such as James Richards and Noel Twyman, for
example, have found Hemming to be extremely reliable. The longest chapter in BLOODY
TREASON (1998), for example, is devoted to Hemming. If Hemming had disputed Judyth's
authenticity rather than endorsed it, I imagine he (Simkin) would have said nothing. That
he praises Jack's posts on this forum speaks volumes about his knowledge of this thread.
[quote name='Greg Burnham' post='190635' date='Apr 24 2010, 01:07 AM']
[quote name='John Simkin' post='190387' date='Apr 21 2010, 11:08 PM']
[quote name='Greg Burnham' post='190386' date='Apr 22 2010, 06:44 AM']
For what it's worth, HEMMING believed her. And HEMMING was a hard case--a difficult man to convince of anything. He was probably tougher than most skeptics could ever be. He wouldn't have asked me to give her the time of day otherwise.[/quote]
Hemming did know a lot but as one CIA insider told me, he was paid by the word. Hemming was one member of the Forum who was a disinformation agent.[/quote]
John,
In all due respect, I wonder if you ever dared to call him a disinfo agent while he was alive? I have literally hundreds of thousands of HEMMING's words--and they didn't cost me a dime. If you had been aware of his meager means you most likely wouldn't have said this. If I described his former living condition as "sub-modest" it would still be a drastic overstatement. HEMMING may have been a lot of things, but he wasn't a snitch and he wasn't for sale. For sure...
[/quote]