A Coup Against or By the State?

[Charles Drago]

Stan,

Many thanks for joining us and for your most thought-provoking contributions. Some comments follow.

The forces that killed JFK, I think, have ownership of the government - they control it - but they are not of it.

If I may paraphrase: Those forces govern in the broadest sense, but they are not to be found within the over-government as advertised.

Those that ordered the murder never came close to getting their hands dirty with the crime. After making the decision they didn't have to touch a thing.

These are the "Sponsors" of whom Evica and I have written. And yes, their hands are clean and uncalloused and stink of death.

This comes from Peter Dale Scott and is key, I think, to understanding the assassination:

Group 2 (Intelligence/Rightwing/Oil group) finds Group 3 (Anti-Castro Cubans) and give them direction emotionally and physically toward their already stong desires to get rid of this president. This group thinks they have it over Group 2 because the Attorney General is helping them with their cause against their enemy (Castro).

Group 3 is suspicious of Group 2 and sets up a patsy (same patsy created by Group 2) to not only be patsied but to blame the assassination on their other enemy. Two birds with one stone.

Here's where I have the temerity to part company with Professor Scott: I have great difficulty in ascribing to Group 3 the requisite resources (including that of nerve) to alter so significantly the Group 2 plan. Even if, out of a well-reasoned expectation of betrayal, they had tried to set up a multi-purpose patsy, their masters almost by definition would have discovered the plan and either quashed it or taken advantage of it.

In fact, such a move by Group 3 would have been all too predictable. There is a far better than even chance that Group 2 "Facilitators," as Evica and I label them, had plans in place to deal with just this contingency -- or perhaps they manipulated Group 3 into making the move so as to control it.

We also need to recognize that the anti-Castro Cubans, so driven by emotion and so unsophisticated in the grander schemes of life, must have been kept on a short leash. They would not have been given full responsibility for the "mechanical" aspects of the hit, for instance; the hunters of humans who fired on JFK were the best of their lot and beyond Gusano reach.

Murdering leaders who don't cooperate with the business model is all part of the plan.

"Business model" is a fine, eloquent, but incomplete description of that which was mortally threatened by JFK.

I submit that there was what I'll refer to as a spiritual motivation behind the assassination -- one that was inextricably linked to the economic profit/power maintenance motives.