28-04-2010, 03:39 PM
(This post was last modified: 28-04-2010, 03:54 PM by Bob Ringler.)
To be honest, I have not put a lot of attention on the magic bullet part of this case. My focus has been on the grassy knoll.
With all due respect , you all have debated this issue long enough(over 40 years). It is time to solve it. We have to solve it with what we have. There is more than enough evidence to solve this case if you all would just look in the right place.
Even if some of the data has been manipulated(which I think it has been, specially some of the film evidence. I am sure that frames are missing from some films)!
I agree with you that there were two head shots. The most important medical evidence for me is this xray of jfk skull. That picture paints a very simple picture. It says there was a shot to his head from behind and there was a final shot to his temple area. That shot to the temple came from the grassy knoll. That round hole is an entry wound and it came after the shot from behind. Its kind of like a punctuation mark! To the assassins it was their insurance card.
![[Image: jfk_skull.png]](http://hogtuner.net/bman/jfk_skull.png)
With all due respect , you all have debated this issue long enough(over 40 years). It is time to solve it. We have to solve it with what we have. There is more than enough evidence to solve this case if you all would just look in the right place.
Even if some of the data has been manipulated(which I think it has been, specially some of the film evidence. I am sure that frames are missing from some films)!
I agree with you that there were two head shots. The most important medical evidence for me is this xray of jfk skull. That picture paints a very simple picture. It says there was a shot to his head from behind and there was a final shot to his temple area. That shot to the temple came from the grassy knoll. That round hole is an entry wound and it came after the shot from behind. Its kind of like a punctuation mark! To the assassins it was their insurance card.