28-05-2010, 09:13 PM
Dawn
I know assistance has been offered. And I've read all the wailing and gnashing of teeth from Walt.
You suggest he just wanted it made unaccessible.
Walt
Why not take the necessary steps to make this research accessible?
Again, I refer to the ARRB and the work of Doug Horne--to place the information surrounding the murder of the people's president before the people.
Yet the protests of personal ownership of this information drown out the ARRB Act.
As for renewal, that would be predicated on whipping it out.
Failure to do so is a de facto admission Dawn's posit is correct.
Further this deponent sayeth not
I know assistance has been offered. And I've read all the wailing and gnashing of teeth from Walt.
You suggest he just wanted it made unaccessible.
Walt
Why not take the necessary steps to make this research accessible?
Again, I refer to the ARRB and the work of Doug Horne--to place the information surrounding the murder of the people's president before the people.
Yet the protests of personal ownership of this information drown out the ARRB Act.
As for renewal, that would be predicated on whipping it out.
Failure to do so is a de facto admission Dawn's posit is correct.
Further this deponent sayeth not