Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Lifton attacks Fetzer over 9/11 and Israeli Complicity
#18
As a UK resident, I'm a bit reluctant to pitch in on this but, from my relatively lightweight study to date, there are at least two areas that I find VERY puzzling if we are to accept that the aircraft allegedly involved were indeed the scheduled flights claimed in the official narrative.

The most compelling one is that the engine parts agreed to have been found and photographs of which are in the public domain, could NOT have come from the aircraft they are supposed to have come from - no references to hand but they are easily locatable. Also all FOI requests for information about part numbers from alleged wrecked (black boxes etc) that I have seen reported have been declined on clearly spurious grounds. What ARE they trying to hide?

The other thing that niggles away at me is a compelling analysis of the video of the second tower strike. fairly simple frame by frame analysis seems to demonstrate that the time taken for the 'plane' to travel its own length - ending with the nose just touching the tower, is EXACTLY the same as the time taken for the tail section to vanish inside the tower from the moment the nose first touched - the impact causing no slowing whatsoever IOW.

Seems to me that both those issues beg for authoritative official response but instead - Silence.
Peter Presland

".....there is something far worse than Nazism, and that is the hubris of the Anglo-American fraternities, whose routine is to incite indigenous monsters to war, and steer the pandemonium to further their imperial aims"
Guido Preparata. Preface to 'Conjuring Hitler'[size=12][size=12]
"Never believe anything until it has been officially denied"
Claud Cockburn

[/SIZE][/SIZE]
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Lifton attacks Fetzer over 9/11 and Israeli Complicity - by Mark Stapleton - 07-06-2010, 02:47 PM
Lifton attacks Fetzer over 9/11 and Israeli Complicity - by Peter Presland - 22-06-2010, 06:31 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  DPF Bans Professor James H. Fetzer: The Rationale The Moderators 69 369,169 04-04-2020, 09:01 AM
Last Post: Mark A. O'Blazney
  The Mellon Foundation attacks Jim Garrison Anthony Thorne 4 14,734 14-09-2018, 02:11 AM
Last Post: James Lateer
  Clay Shaw’s “Centro Mondiale Commerciale” and its Israeli connections Paz Marverde 43 45,012 15-05-2018, 07:26 AM
Last Post: Scott Kaiser
  Clay Shaw’s Centro Mondiale Commerciale and its Israeli connections Paz Marverde 1 10,918 03-12-2017, 07:03 PM
Last Post: Paz Marverde
  Epstein attacks Stone and Snowden in credulous Hwd Reporter article Joseph McBride 7 5,187 20-09-2016, 04:40 PM
Last Post: Scott Kaiser
  Has Lifton Cracked The Case? Albert Doyle 35 25,357 03-04-2016, 08:49 PM
Last Post: Jim DiEugenio
  The Decline and Fall of Jim Fetzer Jim DiEugenio 132 74,106 18-03-2016, 06:51 PM
Last Post: Richard Coleman
  Are H&L website attacks Voodoo Research? Jim Hargrove 0 2,338 26-03-2014, 10:52 PM
Last Post: Jim Hargrove
  From James Fetzer's Group - for those interested Adele Edisen 5 3,840 08-06-2013, 12:47 AM
Last Post: Jeffrey Orling
  Fetzer gets a listing in Urban Dictionary: 'Fetzering' is a term for talking balls. Seamus Coogan 83 24,142 26-03-2013, 11:24 PM
Last Post: John Mooney

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)