23-06-2010, 02:48 AM
(This post was last modified: 23-06-2010, 02:51 AM by James H. Fetzer.)
Someone who would be taken in by such an absurd account is not
qualified for the study of serious subjects like JFK and 9/11. You
ask about Steve Jones, where you appear to be as uninformed in
that matter as you are in these. Steve was fixated on thermite/
themate/superthermite as the explanation for the "collapse" of the
Twin Towers. I became convinced that thermite/thermate/super-
thermite could not possibly be the whole explanation and sought
to broaden the discussion of alternative hypotheses, which he and
his allies did not want to do. He resigned, they conducted a fake
vote of the membership (pretending to represent the society's
administrator), and even froze the site (which I had maintained
from scratch). I was forced to create a new site. All of this is
easily available in the archives of the society, which are found at
http://911scholars.org under the heading, "Founder's Corner", as
SCHOLARS: ON ITS FIRST ANNIVERSARY
Incorporating the Society as a Non-Profit Corporation
25 November 2006, James H. Fetzer
Jim Fetzer Responds to Steve Jones
9 December 2006, James H. Fetzer
Faction Freezes Society's Web Site:
Scholars for 9/11 Truth Threatened
29 December 2006, James H. Fetzer
More in sorrow than in anger...
4 January 2007, James H. Fetzer
Domain Name Dispute Decision
16 February 2007
I am very sorry, Dawn, but this juvenile outburst should have been
beneath you. I hope you do more homework for your practice than
you are demonstrating here. When John Judge is right, I support
him; and when he is wrong, I do not. The very idea that a stew
would be invited to the "crash site" and shown a severed arm of a
purported victim is quite fantastic. Do you understand that there is
no evidence of a Boeing 757 having hit the building? I gave you the
link to an article that would have taken fifteen minutes to read and
disillusioned you of that false belief. That you seem to regard John
as some kind of flawless human is stunning. This is less a question
of my arrogance than of your own gullibility. Nevertheless, I want
to tell you how much I have appreciated your good work in the past
and wish you the best for your future in your practice and research.
qualified for the study of serious subjects like JFK and 9/11. You
ask about Steve Jones, where you appear to be as uninformed in
that matter as you are in these. Steve was fixated on thermite/
themate/superthermite as the explanation for the "collapse" of the
Twin Towers. I became convinced that thermite/thermate/super-
thermite could not possibly be the whole explanation and sought
to broaden the discussion of alternative hypotheses, which he and
his allies did not want to do. He resigned, they conducted a fake
vote of the membership (pretending to represent the society's
administrator), and even froze the site (which I had maintained
from scratch). I was forced to create a new site. All of this is
easily available in the archives of the society, which are found at
http://911scholars.org under the heading, "Founder's Corner", as
SCHOLARS: ON ITS FIRST ANNIVERSARY
Incorporating the Society as a Non-Profit Corporation
25 November 2006, James H. Fetzer
Jim Fetzer Responds to Steve Jones
9 December 2006, James H. Fetzer
Faction Freezes Society's Web Site:
Scholars for 9/11 Truth Threatened
29 December 2006, James H. Fetzer
More in sorrow than in anger...
4 January 2007, James H. Fetzer
Domain Name Dispute Decision
16 February 2007
I am very sorry, Dawn, but this juvenile outburst should have been
beneath you. I hope you do more homework for your practice than
you are demonstrating here. When John Judge is right, I support
him; and when he is wrong, I do not. The very idea that a stew
would be invited to the "crash site" and shown a severed arm of a
purported victim is quite fantastic. Do you understand that there is
no evidence of a Boeing 757 having hit the building? I gave you the
link to an article that would have taken fifteen minutes to read and
disillusioned you of that false belief. That you seem to regard John
as some kind of flawless human is stunning. This is less a question
of my arrogance than of your own gullibility. Nevertheless, I want
to tell you how much I have appreciated your good work in the past
and wish you the best for your future in your practice and research.
Dawn Meredith Wrote:James H. Fetzer Wrote:Good points, Jack. Unfortunately, I came on Black Op
Radio after John Judge had just presented this absurd
story about his friend, the stewardess, and made some
highly unflattering remarks about him. Anyone wanting
more about the Pentagon might want to check this out:
"What Didn't Happen at the Pentagon"
http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.com/2010...-pentagon.html
The "absurd" story is from well known MLK researcher Tamera Carter (aka T Carter). That you would badmouth John Judge - who is and has been COPA for so long tells me more than I need to know. Or perhaps exactly what I needed to know.
And just why is it that you and Steven Jones are no longer speaking? (Never mind, it is a rhetorical question)
Dawn
ps I don't tell you how to teach philosophy so do not tell me how to practice law. FWIW I am in the process of trying to find witnesses who were in NY. But I work full time at law so don't have the time of a - (possibly-) retired philosophy prof who was utterly unable to answer a question but instead directed me to web sites. I am open to the truth. Period. People may well have been fooled into thinking they saw something, that did not happen. I think certainly T could have been fooled as I have looked at Jack's stuff re the Pentagon.
But to badmouth John Judge on air is very telling of your arrogance. So frankly this discussion is, for me, over.