25-12-2008, 09:30 PM
Mark Stapleton Wrote:It's interesting, David. This time Russia actually holds the better poker hand, because the US can't afford to keep upping the ante anymore.
The shoe is now on the other foot.
Hopefully Obama will see the futility of it and fold his cards.
If psychotic Texas billionaires and their friends want to indulge in kamikaze poker games, let them do it in Texas--leave the rest of us out of it.
I can't imagine Obama seeing much other than Zbigniew Brzezinski's rabid anti-Russian perspective.
Unlike the cold-war days, when the USSR was attributed by the west with a globalist agenda (rightly or wrongly), Russia appeared to simply want the U.S. to stay out of its backyard. Which the elite hegemonic globalists were clearly unwilling to do.
My nightmare ... also my daymare.... is that Obama and his controllers fully wish to continue to covertly, militaristically, engage Russia and China in skirmishes (via proxies and others) right up to a final confrontation. They appear to have failed to 'divide and conquer' Russia (which was the goal after the fall of the wall) and it would be foolish to imagine China is anything but clearly aware of the hegemony's agenda ... I imagine they are fully prepared as well. I have read that China recently completed a defense agreement with Pakistan and the SCO does not appear terribly threatened by India's fascist-driven, false flag utlizing, war mongering towards Pakistan.
What I hope is that the current events are possibly signals that
the Empire's strategists have screwed up a bit. Or maybe it is just the current strategy is too complex and too global to permit the kind of focus necessary for successful actions.
I'm just kind of rambling in my musings ... and would like to understand other folk's perspectives on the globalists' strategies and behavior.
the