29-06-2010, 09:21 PM
"Oswald" is a term of art for Dulles, Lansdale, Johnson, Hoover et al.
They acquired "the rifle" in February; the biological Oswald did not:
http://www.jfklancerforum.com/dc/dcboard...85804&page=
The ever-helpful Ruth Paine intuits Oswald acted out in the manner of domestic violence, rebuffed by his estranged wife, he had an epiphany, the Conquering Hero, "I'll kill the president; that will win her heart."
But alas, I believe the Warren Commission said motive didn't matter.
Besides, Oswald shot at Walker and killed Tippit, therefore killed Kennedy.
Oswald killed Kennedy and shot at Walker, so he killed Tippit.
Oswald killed Tippit because he killed Kennedy--because he shot at Walker.
When did he decide to shoot at Walker?
Oswald was created on the armature of need, from sheets of legend dipped in a solution of one part disinformation to two parts commietol.
Painted with lurid phrases from Phillips' notebook ("assassin's lair") and highlighted with staged emotional outbursts, a leafleting scuffle, a consulate tantrum.
The rhetorical question remains for the playwrights of the coup to supply but we are left with crickets, and popcorn crunching beneath our shoes as we exit.
![[Image: 51brqo.jpg]](http://i39.tinypic.com/51brqo.jpg)
They acquired "the rifle" in February; the biological Oswald did not:
http://www.jfklancerforum.com/dc/dcboard...85804&page=
The ever-helpful Ruth Paine intuits Oswald acted out in the manner of domestic violence, rebuffed by his estranged wife, he had an epiphany, the Conquering Hero, "I'll kill the president; that will win her heart."
But alas, I believe the Warren Commission said motive didn't matter.
Besides, Oswald shot at Walker and killed Tippit, therefore killed Kennedy.
Oswald killed Kennedy and shot at Walker, so he killed Tippit.
Oswald killed Tippit because he killed Kennedy--because he shot at Walker.
When did he decide to shoot at Walker?
Oswald was created on the armature of need, from sheets of legend dipped in a solution of one part disinformation to two parts commietol.
Painted with lurid phrases from Phillips' notebook ("assassin's lair") and highlighted with staged emotional outbursts, a leafleting scuffle, a consulate tantrum.
The rhetorical question remains for the playwrights of the coup to supply but we are left with crickets, and popcorn crunching beneath our shoes as we exit.