Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Wikipedia as a 9/11 disinformation op
#3
The precise chapter and verse run-down on Jim Fetzer's 9/11 Wikipedia experience are new to me. However, the principles they illustrate are VERY familiar. As Peter L says, when it comes to the major Deep State issues, the Wikipedia set up is designed - at the very minimum - to ensure that orthodoxy and the official narrative prevails. Diebold and the Deep Capture naked Short selling sagas are good illustrations of how the censorship operates.

I've had dozens of instances over the past few years where my edits were reversed; followed by warnings to desist or else. All justified by reference to the Wikipedia editing-rule definitions known as 'Neutral point of view' and 'Notability of sources'.

I got so pissed with it that I started WikiSpooks. Not that I expect WikiSpooks to get anywhere close to either the coverage or readership of Wikipedia; it's just that, on the real Deep State issues where Wikipedia is indeed an effective disinfo operation, editing rules that impose a presumption AGAINST authority are what is needed for them to have any chance of getting to the nub of the matter so-to-speak. So that is what I've done:

Clear editorial rules that make copious reference to their Wikipedia counterparts and largely invert them are imposed. Anyone who makes persistent efforts to bias articles in favour of 'the official narrative' will be treated in the exactly same manner as Wikipedia dissidents.
All the site really needs now is for a few of those dissidents to stop banging their heads against the Wikipedia brick wall and try a bit of WikiSpooking instead. Wink

I've even refrained from putting up anything much on 911 to date (just a category skeleton and a bit of stuff on WT7) in hopes that Jim - or someone as knowledgeable - will chip in a bit. The subject is so big and serious that I really would like to get it right.
Peter Presland

".....there is something far worse than Nazism, and that is the hubris of the Anglo-American fraternities, whose routine is to incite indigenous monsters to war, and steer the pandemonium to further their imperial aims"
Guido Preparata. Preface to 'Conjuring Hitler'[size=12][size=12]
"Never believe anything until it has been officially denied"
Claud Cockburn

[/SIZE][/SIZE]
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Wikipedia as a 9/11 disinformation op - by Peter Presland - 07-07-2010, 07:46 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  BBC/MI5 disinformation/propaganda hit piece on 911 and 'conspiracy theorists' Peter Lemkin 0 4,440 17-02-2018, 09:54 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  9-11 and disinformation Dawn Meredith 9 6,443 24-03-2015, 12:03 AM
Last Post: R.K. Locke
  Disinformation Killed 9/11 "Truth" Joe Giambrone 9 8,924 22-01-2014, 10:49 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  Pepper Letter Reflecting on 911 & Information v. Disinformation Peter Lemkin 2 4,216 03-12-2012, 05:40 PM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  Wikipedia Editors Attempt Controlled Demo On 911-Truth Peter Lemkin 0 3,057 01-05-2009, 06:13 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)