The Lyndon Johnson-Nelson Rockefeller Connection to the JFK Assassination

[Jan Klimkowski]

I've only just read this thread.

Dawn - thank you for your measured interventions.

Charles has articulated his Mechanic/Facilitator/Sponsor template for deep political events, such as the JFK assassination, many times on this forum.

Just as LBJ is an important geopolitical TOOL (in all that word's connotations), so that Mechanic/Facilitator/Sponsor template is a valuable means of analysing deep political events.

Meanwhile:

Is this what I supposed to "learn?":

Charles Drago:

"In point of fact, the long-term survival of that [Fidel Castro-controlled Cuban] government was then -- and remains to this day -- a key component in the preservation of hemispheric threat as a justification for military expenditures and a cover for assorted deep political operations."

There is ABSOLUTELY NOTHING in the historical record to support that statement. I don't think I have heard anyone - leftwing, rightwing, middle wing, deep politics, on the surface politics promote THAT THEORY before. I guess there is a 1 in 1 quadrillion chance it could be accurate.

Robert - you are, quite simply, wrong. There is plenty of evidence to suggest that the preservation of Castro's Cuba, as a hemispheric "bogeyman", is a core objective of deep political forces.

Indeed, the very survival of Castro's Cuba into the second decade of the C21st is powerful evidence that it is serving a deep political purpose.

The principles at the core of Operation Gladio include false flag atrocities committed to induce maximum public terror as part of a Strategy of Tension. This has been much discussed here on DPF.

The Bologna railway bombings in 1980, which killed 85 and wounded over 200, was blamed on the left-wing Red Brigades. In fact it was a Gladio Strategy of Tension operation, perpetrated by neofascist cut outs the Nuclei Armati Rivoluzionari (NAR, "Armed Revolutionary Nuclei").

The public execution of JFK was another such operation.

Everybody - at the risk of sounding pompous, please can we discuss the evidence, rigorously and robustly, and cut out the personal shit.