Chemtrails

[Sam Kent]

[size=12]Next, K&L treat us to a classic strawman fallacy:

[/SIZE]

Strawman as in “I see planes spraying chemicals 30K feet above my house.”?

[size=12]The broader agenda is to assault all conspiracy hypotheses with the weapons of pseudoscience, evasion, and ridicule.

[/SIZE]
Pseudoscience?
What kind of proof is “Because I said so.”? That’s all they have as proof. That’s the same proof they used for income verification two years ago, which precipitated the mortgage crisis.
The science of contrail formation is science fact. It has been proven many times over the years.
The science of chemtrails is based on nothing more than fallacious supposition.
When you practice that kind of backyard science you have to expect bugs in the results.

Evasion?
As in not answering my question? I’ll ask it again.
Doesn’t the picture I provided from 1940 show the same ‘saw tooth’ pattern as the one Jack provided, where he claimed it’s ‘new’?
We non believers have provided evidence at every turn. Where the believers have only provided supposition.

Ridicule?
We ridicule the believers theories not the person.

[size=12]Nonetheless, something stinks about the Kent/Lewis attacks. And I assure you, I'm not the only one who has their scent.

[/SIZE]

The only thing that stinks is some of the theories that Hbers have. Not the people.