30-12-2008, 03:27 PM
Mark Stapleton Wrote:Meaning?
This thread is like an old Batman episode with the Riddler--he of the criminal conundrums--as the caped crusader's Nemesis.
Actually, Mark, my point isn't all that Riddler-esque.
If and when we discover the identities of the Sponsors of Dallas, we will be surprised. There were two main objectives of the JFK hit: kill him and protect the entities that gave the order.
So far, so good on both counts.
Have we stumbled upon one or two Sponsors over the years? Probably.
Did Harriman emerge from their midsts with a delicate brief that required him to risk maintaining a public persona? Probably.
Is Harriman the root of all evil? Not a chance.
Charles Drago
Co-Founder, Deep Politics Forum
If an individual, through either his own volition or events over which he had no control, found himself taking up residence in a country undefined by flags or physical borders, he could be assured of one immediate and abiding consequence: He was on his own, and solitude and loneliness would probably be his companions unto the grave.
-- James Lee Burke, Rain Gods
You can't blame the innocent, they are always guiltless. All you can do is control them or eliminate them. Innocence is a kind of insanity.
-- Graham Greene
Co-Founder, Deep Politics Forum
If an individual, through either his own volition or events over which he had no control, found himself taking up residence in a country undefined by flags or physical borders, he could be assured of one immediate and abiding consequence: He was on his own, and solitude and loneliness would probably be his companions unto the grave.
-- James Lee Burke, Rain Gods
You can't blame the innocent, they are always guiltless. All you can do is control them or eliminate them. Innocence is a kind of insanity.
-- Graham Greene