21-09-2010, 06:25 PM
Albert Doyle Wrote:I've noticed a trend of very strict dogma in CT forums where CTer's preserve a strict dogma of strict CT theory and don't allow any other possibilities. It's my opinion that that actually weakens the CT case. I'm very much a conspiracy believer, so hinting that maybe someone "doesn't belong on this site" is very offensive to me. I've done enough homework to at least make a case for what I'm saying. I feel CTer's have a tendency to try to escalate the discussion into this us vs them too soon in order to avoid addressing unwanted subjects.
Again, I see no one addressed my point that the witness who testified he distinctly heard a "melon smashing sound" corroborated the skull flap head wound. What that man heard was the dull thud of the blood burst shown in Zapruder. That is the sound such an explosive brain material event makes. I'm just trying to keep this discussion real and hold CTer's to the same level of honest evidence they hold LNer's to.
If you knew me personally, the accusation of my being a psy-ops disinfo spook would be a serious travesty. If we don't escalate, and stick to just the simple facts, the melon sound corroborates the skull flap wound seen in Zapruder. And that witness experiencing that sound live and telling of it is something out of the control of any alterers.
Before suggesting I don't belong on this forum I suggest answering the point. With the technology available at the time how did the alterers create the gory, meaty flesh wound seen in Zapruder?
It is not a CT THEORY that the Zfilm is fraudulent. If you
think it is a "theory", you have not studied the FACTS.
Jack