27-10-2010, 08:37 PM
For the moment, let me say that Charles caught some differences affected by my further research on Bobby between "JFK and RFK" and "RFK", which are well-taken. What I say in "RFK" takes precedence over what I said about RFK in "JFK and RFK". As for JFK, there are indications of involvement by the Dallas Police Department, the Dallas County Sheriff's Department, anti-Castro Cubans, the CIA, the military, and LBJ's personal hit-man. I have said more about this many places, perhaps most conveniently in "Dealey Plaza Revisied: What Happened to JFK?", which can be download from http://www.und.edu/org/jfkconference/ as its Chapter 30. There are limitations as to the extent of the detail that can be covered in articles for public consumption, where references and later commentaries can bear some of the burden. For example, if you visit my blog and check out the discussion of "JFK and RKF", some points are covered that were not covered or were only incompletely covered in the article: http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.com/2010/06/...-them.html I certainly agree that not all the answers can be found here, but I am doing what I can to advance the cause of truth for them both. I value the kinds of discussion that are taking place here.