28-10-2010, 05:04 PM
(This post was last modified: 28-10-2010, 05:09 PM by Jack White.)
May I assert that NO ONE PERSON knows for certain the exact solution
to the JFK case. Many brilliant minds (for instance Charles Drago and
Jim Fetzer) have studied all the same facts and often reach differing
conclusions. So it is a mistake for anyone to claim that anyone is
right or wrong.
As much as I admire the grasp of facts and logical assimilation of them
by Jim and Charles, I agree/disagree with them on numerous threads of
the overall assassination fabric. Where Charles is often super-cautious
and conservative even in the face of strong evidence, Jim often rushes
in to embrace weak evidence as being compelling. These traits, however,
do not diminish the overall thrust of either toward reaching a solution.
Not as a criticism of either of these brilliant researchers, let me offer
my thoughts, which may differ from theirs in detail, but are all aimed
at the same target as theirs:
1. Lyndon was a PIVOTAL player in the assassination, but not necessarily
the planner nor prime mover. He was NECESSARY to the plot. It could
not be pulled off without his cooperation and approval. He was necessary
for the coverup. So in name only he was the MAIN player, the most
essential.
2. The plotters were a loose-knit informal CONSORTIUM of many
powerful players which Prouty called THE SECRET TEAM. I will not go
into detail on that here, but it operated through Dulles and was controlled
by those who controlled Dulles. Big Money people.
3. Lee Harvey Oswald was a persona used by the CIA for various
purposes. Two OR MORE persons connected to the CIA and the
assassination used the LHO persona. The invention of the LHO
doppelgangers was initially related to an infiltration of Russia, but
then was morphed into other assignments, including PATSY.
4. Much evidence was fabricated/altered to frame the patsy, the
most important of which was the fabricated Zapruder film.
5. All we know for certain about the case is that JFK was killed
on Elm Street in Dallas at 12:30 on 11-22-63, and that on Sunday,
Jack Ruby killed the accused patsy.
6. Subsequent to 1963, other persons came to our attention with
information, some good, some bad, some disinformation. Here is my
appraisal of the importance of some of them:
Madeleine Brown...yes
Gordon Arnold...yes
Steven Louis Witt...no
Charles Harrelson...yes
E H Hunt...yes
David Atlee Phillips...yes
Gedney, Abrams, Doyle...no
Charles Rodgers...no
Roscoe White...yes
James Files...no
Chauncey Holt...no
Judyth Baker...no
E H Hunt confession...yes
This may not be a complete list. But I have studied the same information
as Jim and Charles, and though my conclusions may differ from theirs,
I feel my conclusions are as valid as theirs, given my study of all the
evidence since 1963. BUT LISTEN, PEOPLE...these are all minor players
in this list, with minor pieces of the puzzle. Agreeing or disagreeing on
these minor details is inconsequential. They are distractions from the
target. The bullseye of the target is who the plotters were...and certainly
nobody on the list was a prime suspect. So let's agree that disagreement
over these minor characters is not significant in pursuing the ones
behind the killing of the president. No disrespect to Jim's beliefs, but
it is totally irrelevant to finding the killers whether or not a woman had
an affair with the patsy; likewise, no disrespect for Charles' belief
that the faking of the Z film is totally irrelevant to identifying the killers.
Jack
to the JFK case. Many brilliant minds (for instance Charles Drago and
Jim Fetzer) have studied all the same facts and often reach differing
conclusions. So it is a mistake for anyone to claim that anyone is
right or wrong.
As much as I admire the grasp of facts and logical assimilation of them
by Jim and Charles, I agree/disagree with them on numerous threads of
the overall assassination fabric. Where Charles is often super-cautious
and conservative even in the face of strong evidence, Jim often rushes
in to embrace weak evidence as being compelling. These traits, however,
do not diminish the overall thrust of either toward reaching a solution.
Not as a criticism of either of these brilliant researchers, let me offer
my thoughts, which may differ from theirs in detail, but are all aimed
at the same target as theirs:
1. Lyndon was a PIVOTAL player in the assassination, but not necessarily
the planner nor prime mover. He was NECESSARY to the plot. It could
not be pulled off without his cooperation and approval. He was necessary
for the coverup. So in name only he was the MAIN player, the most
essential.
2. The plotters were a loose-knit informal CONSORTIUM of many
powerful players which Prouty called THE SECRET TEAM. I will not go
into detail on that here, but it operated through Dulles and was controlled
by those who controlled Dulles. Big Money people.
3. Lee Harvey Oswald was a persona used by the CIA for various
purposes. Two OR MORE persons connected to the CIA and the
assassination used the LHO persona. The invention of the LHO
doppelgangers was initially related to an infiltration of Russia, but
then was morphed into other assignments, including PATSY.
4. Much evidence was fabricated/altered to frame the patsy, the
most important of which was the fabricated Zapruder film.
5. All we know for certain about the case is that JFK was killed
on Elm Street in Dallas at 12:30 on 11-22-63, and that on Sunday,
Jack Ruby killed the accused patsy.
6. Subsequent to 1963, other persons came to our attention with
information, some good, some bad, some disinformation. Here is my
appraisal of the importance of some of them:
Madeleine Brown...yes
Gordon Arnold...yes
Steven Louis Witt...no
Charles Harrelson...yes
E H Hunt...yes
David Atlee Phillips...yes
Gedney, Abrams, Doyle...no
Charles Rodgers...no
Roscoe White...yes
James Files...no
Chauncey Holt...no
Judyth Baker...no
E H Hunt confession...yes
This may not be a complete list. But I have studied the same information
as Jim and Charles, and though my conclusions may differ from theirs,
I feel my conclusions are as valid as theirs, given my study of all the
evidence since 1963. BUT LISTEN, PEOPLE...these are all minor players
in this list, with minor pieces of the puzzle. Agreeing or disagreeing on
these minor details is inconsequential. They are distractions from the
target. The bullseye of the target is who the plotters were...and certainly
nobody on the list was a prime suspect. So let's agree that disagreement
over these minor characters is not significant in pursuing the ones
behind the killing of the president. No disrespect to Jim's beliefs, but
it is totally irrelevant to finding the killers whether or not a woman had
an affair with the patsy; likewise, no disrespect for Charles' belief
that the faking of the Z film is totally irrelevant to identifying the killers.
Jack