05-11-2010, 05:21 PM
Albert,
I like all your posts, but this one seems to be especially on the point.
You make an excellent suggestion, where a film of this kind might be
based upon ME & LEE together with other valuable source about what
was going on in New Orleans shortly before the assassination. That's
an extremely valuable idea, which I hope will eventually be pursued.
Jim
I like all your posts, but this one seems to be especially on the point.
You make an excellent suggestion, where a film of this kind might be
based upon ME & LEE together with other valuable source about what
was going on in New Orleans shortly before the assassination. That's
an extremely valuable idea, which I hope will eventually be pursued.
Jim
Albert Doyle Wrote:In my opinion the strongest evidence for conspiracy is exposing Oswald's true background and the government's attempt to cover it up. Once Oswald's true background is shown to the public it becomes obvious who and what he was. Forget bullet and shot analysis and endless pouring over pictures, the strongest evidence for conspiracy is a plain look at Oswald and those he surrounded himself with.
A quick look at Oswald shows he was an impressionable fatherless boy who tried to emulate and copycat Herbert Philbrick. From there he ended up a CIA operative during his Marine service at Atsugi Airbase. He was then used as a false defector into Russia for unknown purposes, but purposes nevertheless that can be predictably estimated. Upon his return to the US he then worked with the FBI as an agent provocateur pretending to be a pro-Castro communist.
An individual's Kennedy Assassination validity can be automatically litmus tested by gauging how they react to this true background. If they reject it and consider Oswald a Lone Nut who did all this stuff on his own then they are a Warren Commission apologist and have automatically dismissed themselves as such and can not be taken seriously or have their input considered in Kennedy Assassination matters. However, if they recognize it then they are valid observers and understand the truth behind the Assassination.
So the point I'm getting at is once you understand how deeply involved Oswald was with the FBI/CIA underground it then becomes impossible to consider he somehow broke-off from this group and its influences on November 22 1963 and decided to kill Kennedy on his own for whatever reasons. What Warren Commission apologists are asking us to believe is Lee Harvey Oswald was a deep operator within CIA's most active anti-Castro program, and mingled with all those who would be the ones associated with killing Kennedy and having reasons to do so, yet he somehow broke away from all this on November 22 1963 and did it on his own.
That's how you prove the Kennedy Assassination conspiracy. The best way to show this obvious proof is to make an Oliver Stone-type movie of this approach. It's something the dummy public would understand upon seeing.