12-11-2010, 02:53 AM
Peter Dawson Wrote:Regarding the small number that aren't easily explained, I'm not going to take the word of the hoax-believers over the word of the scientific establishment, if only because the former are still clinging to easily dismissed evidence to support their case, and that ain't at all cool.
This is fatally flawed reasoning on your part insofar as the "scientific establishment" you implicitly endorse and even champion -- like all establishments -- is far more often than not guilty of precisely the sin which you accuse "hoax-believers" of commiting.
I give you the Single Bullet Theory and the NAA "proofs" of the JFK lone nut hypothesis.
For starters.
I don't know you by your deep political work other than what you've posted here, and I mean to cast no personal aspersions. I simply note for the record that your posts on this thread fit a pattern a sophistic arguments and ad hominem attacks directed at Jack White and Jim Fetzer by known disinformation agents and propagandists here and elsewhere.
For your information, Jack White's contributions to the quests for truth and justice in the JFK case are among the most important to be offered in the long, storied history of Kennedy assassination researchers.
Jim Fetzer -- with whom I often and at times strenuously disagree -- has shown himself to be a man and scholar of principle and an impassioned warrior for the truth.
You write that you "agree with the gist of [my] hypothesis". By all means please elaborate on your agreement. All of us over the years have had to establish our deep political bona fides, and I eagerly await your presentation of your portfolio.
Make no mistake: Until you do so, your "sack of shit" and "threats" characterizations of widely respected and learned men will be accepted as nothing more or less than enemy action.
Charles Drago
Co-Founder, Deep Politics Forum
If an individual, through either his own volition or events over which he had no control, found himself taking up residence in a country undefined by flags or physical borders, he could be assured of one immediate and abiding consequence: He was on his own, and solitude and loneliness would probably be his companions unto the grave.
-- James Lee Burke, Rain Gods
You can't blame the innocent, they are always guiltless. All you can do is control them or eliminate them. Innocence is a kind of insanity.
-- Graham Greene
Co-Founder, Deep Politics Forum
If an individual, through either his own volition or events over which he had no control, found himself taking up residence in a country undefined by flags or physical borders, he could be assured of one immediate and abiding consequence: He was on his own, and solitude and loneliness would probably be his companions unto the grave.
-- James Lee Burke, Rain Gods
You can't blame the innocent, they are always guiltless. All you can do is control them or eliminate them. Innocence is a kind of insanity.
-- Graham Greene