Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Fetzer/Burton Moon Landing Debate Finale
#61
James H. Fetzer Wrote:This fellow Greer is accenting difference in detail between the "rehearsal" footage and the
footage shown. But there similarities far outweigh their differences, as I seek to explain.

Posted Today, 09:40 PM

Jack,

This is a deliberate attempt to obfuscate the argument and make it difficult to follow. I am
told that this is Burton's tactic when his side is losing an argument: submerge it or bury it!
I am stunned by the blatancy of the abuse of position he is demonstrating here. The Greer
argument about the details of the films seems to be entirely beside the point. There are so
many similarities that, if fakery of this degree of similarity is possible, as Greer now claims,
then the faking of the moon landings themselves must have been a piece of cake! So even
if he is right (about the details), he is wrong (about the hoax itself). And if Adam Stewart didn't
do it, obviously someone else did! This is an excellent example of focusing on the trees and
missing the forest. The striking similarities between the "rehearsal" footage and the footage
that was broadcast demonstrates that faking the moon landing would not have been difficult
and, to hear Greer tell it, not all that expensive, too boot! This latest "spoof" footage appears
to be a desperate gambit to take in the unwary. It is rubbish. Again, all this proves too much!

Jim

Jack White, on 12 November 2010 - 09:05 PM, said:

Why have these two threads been merged? This is in violation of the agreement to keep them
separate. This is a gross abuse of Burton's immoderate moderation! I object and ask that
the two threads be UNMERGED!

I have been working on a new study for Jim which he asked me to post in the debate thread.
In it, I acknowledge a flaw in a previous study which caused me to re-examine it and I found
evidence in shadows pointing to three or more lighting sources.

This merged thread abandons the debate (which Burton was losing), and makes it an
incoherent mess. I will not post this new study until the debate thread is reinstated according
to the original agreement.

I ask other moderators to OVERRULE Burton's rash action, and reinstate the debate as
a dedicated thread.

Jack

Dr. Jim.... you've taken them ALL to the cleaners -- it's clear, Burton and Co. need fumigation. Troll fumigation comes to mind...
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Fetzer/Burton Moon Landing Debate Finale - by David Healy - 12-11-2010, 11:35 PM
Fetzer/Burton Moon Landing Debate Finale - by Myra Bronstein - 17-11-2010, 09:49 AM
Fetzer/Burton Moon Landing Debate Finale - by Myra Bronstein - 17-11-2010, 09:59 AM
Fetzer/Burton Moon Landing Debate Finale - by Myra Bronstein - 27-11-2010, 12:16 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  New Massimo Mazzucco documentary on moon landing Tracy Riddle 4 12,324 29-02-2016, 09:41 AM
Last Post: David Guyatt
  Archive of EF Appollo Moon thread Magda Hassan 2 5,574 14-11-2010, 12:59 AM
Last Post: Magda Hassan

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)