13-11-2010, 03:19 AM
Either the "rehearsal" footage strongly resembles the broadcast footage or it does not. If it doesn't strongly resemble the broadcast footage, then it is not a very good "spoof", is it? You seem to be on both sides of this divide, claiming that it was (implicitly, a very good) "spoof" (since otherwise it doesn't work as a "spoof", does it?), but now insisting that it is obviously not a very good spoof. So be sure and let us know what you think when you have some idea what that is. Someone may be a buffoon, but it isn't Jack or me.
Peter Dawson Wrote:I'm not at all pleased that Burton merged the threads - it took the trio 5 pages of the 12 page thread to decide exactly how they would discuss things, and I don't relish the idea of sorting through 40 pages of banter to track down Fetzer's "multiple arguments" if I am to address them. So it's not at all clear that Burton hasn't done JF and JW a favour by merging the threads.
If they were serious about spreading the word about moon mission fakery, why did White present his evidence in a form such that only members of the EF have access to it? I couldn't look at the evidence White was presenting because I'm not a member there - fortunately Burton followed behind providing links to the original NASA pictures White was referring to, otherwise the discussion would have been impossible to follow. If the evidence is on White's side, why does he limit people's access to it?
As for the rest of it, I'm starting to feel like I've stepped into a twilight zone. The space suit in the two "fake" youtube clips match each other precisely. The space suits in the original Apollo 11 missions don't match the space suit in the youtube clips. The moontruth clip is a fake, and Fetzer and White's promotion of it and defense of it makes them look like buffoons. It isn't a "vendetta" for me to say so, it's just the simple, honest truth.