14-11-2010, 05:23 PM
Going back over this thread I saw that Jim Fetzer had linked the following story:
In view of the uniquely historic importance of these tapes, I am deeply suspicious of the claim that "the original recordings of the first humans landing on the moon 40 years ago were erased and re-used" to save money.
This to me has the stink of skunk all over it. "Loosing" such footage would be in-credible enough in itself, but erasing it and then re-using it is simply not believable imo.
This "poor us" NASA hang-out is problematical. I feel sure that the tapes had a unique value and therefore would have had serious collectors lining up by the score to bid for them in an open auction - and would have paid an awful lot of money for them as unique collectibles -- in fact a great deal more money than the value of the bare tape itself.
This argument is akin to NASA arguing to "degausse" a rare Rembrandt or a Van Gogh in order to save money so that they could reuse the canvas?
Are they kidding me?
There is no logic or common sense in this claim.
Frankly I don't buy it.
Quote:http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE56F5MK20090716
Moon landing tapes got erased, NASA admits
By Maggie Fox, Health and Science Editor
WASHINGTON | Thu Jul 16, 2009 3:49pm EDT
(Reuters) - The original recordings of the first humans landing on the moon 40 years ago were erased and re-used, but newly restored copies of the original broadcast look even better, NASA officials said on Thursday.
NASA released the first glimpses of a complete digital make-over of the original landing footage that clarifies the blurry and grainy images of Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin walking on the surface of the moon.
The full set of recordings, being cleaned up by Burbank, California-based Lowry Digital, will be released in September. The preview is available at http://www.nasa.gov.
NASA admitted in 2006 that no one could find the original video recordings of the July 20, 1969, landing.
Since then, Richard Nafzger, an engineer at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Maryland, who oversaw television processing at the ground-tracking sites during the Apollo 11 mission, has been looking for them.
The good news is he found where they went. The bad news is they were part of a batch of 200,000 tapes that were degaussed -- magnetically erased -- and re-used to save money.
"The goal was live TV," Nafzger told a news conference.
"We should have had a historian running around saying 'I don't care if you are ever going to use them -- we are going to keep them'," he said.
They found good copies in the archives of CBS news and some recordings called kinescopes found in film vaults at Johnson Space Center.
Lowry, best known for restoring old Hollywood films, has been digitizing these along with some other bits and pieces to make a new rendering of the original landing.
Nafzger does not worry that using a Hollywood-based company might fuel the fire of conspiracy theorists who believe the entire lunar program that landed people on the moon six times between 1969 and 1972 was staged on a movie set or secret military base.
"This company is restoring historic video. It mattered not to me where the company was from," Nafzger said.
"The conspiracy theorists are going to believe what they are going to believe," added Lowry Digital Chief Operating Officer Mike Inchalik.
And there may be some unofficial copies of the original broadcast out there somewhere that were taken from a NASA video switching center in Sydney, Australia, the space agency said. Nafzger said someone else in Sydney made recordings too.
"These tapes are not in the system," Nafzger said. "We are certainly open to finding them."
In view of the uniquely historic importance of these tapes, I am deeply suspicious of the claim that "the original recordings of the first humans landing on the moon 40 years ago were erased and re-used" to save money.
This to me has the stink of skunk all over it. "Loosing" such footage would be in-credible enough in itself, but erasing it and then re-using it is simply not believable imo.
This "poor us" NASA hang-out is problematical. I feel sure that the tapes had a unique value and therefore would have had serious collectors lining up by the score to bid for them in an open auction - and would have paid an awful lot of money for them as unique collectibles -- in fact a great deal more money than the value of the bare tape itself.
This argument is akin to NASA arguing to "degausse" a rare Rembrandt or a Van Gogh in order to save money so that they could reuse the canvas?
Are they kidding me?
There is no logic or common sense in this claim.
Frankly I don't buy it.
The shadow is a moral problem that challenges the whole ego-personality, for no one can become conscious of the shadow without considerable moral effort. To become conscious of it involves recognizing the dark aspects of the personality as present and real. This act is the essential condition for any kind of self-knowledge.
Carl Jung - Aion (1951). CW 9, Part II: P.14
