Fetzer/Burton Moon Landing Debate Finale

[Peter Dawson]

For Peter D and Jim F

I was not endorsing Peter D's two substantive points, I was simply flagging them as valid pieces of technical/scientific evidence that can be debated on their merits.

What I was objecting to - a bit too soto-voce perhaps but objecting nonetheless - was the personal attack disguised in a (too) clever rhetorical device that comprised the last sentence.

FWIW I have reposted the entire Metapedia article on WikiSpooks here. I haven't tested all 476 footnote links so there may well be a few broken ones. Those I have tested work fine though.

BTW - I intend to incorporate all Jack Whites stuff (duly credited and linked) into the article today - or as and when I get time.

I wasn't intending what I wrote to be a personal attack on JW and JF, though given the way I inserted myself into this discussion, I can't blame you for thinking that it was exactly that. What I was attacking was the moon hoax proponent's position in-general, not any particular moon hoax proponent.

I should take this opportunity to apologise for my initial rudeness:

Jim, sorry for my rude words - my social skills are often found wanting, to my chagrin.