21-11-2010, 12:16 AM
(This post was last modified: 21-11-2010, 07:42 AM by James H. Fetzer.)
Let me parallel your Sponsor/Facilitator/Mechanic model with a Deep
Politics/Politics/Executioner model, which is primarily an alternative
language for saying the same thing. To bring the public from concern
about the Executioners to the Politicians, such as LBJ, Nixon, Ford and
Bush, is, in my opinion, a great advance. It would be wonderful if the
public could ultimately become informed of the Deep Political aspects
as well, but focusing attention on the Political aspects is a tremendous
advance. I therefore find it offensive when you suggest there is some
massively negative aspect about it. The public could never be brought
to understand the Deep Political aspects without initially understanding
the Political specs. And Lyndon was the "pivotal player" because he was
the one who had the driving ambition to become president, knew all of
the players, and was instrumental in bringing "The Big Event" about, as
Madeleine has explained and Billy Sol has confirmed. LBJ even sent his
chief administrative assistant, Cliff Carter, to Dallas to make sure that all
of the arrangements for the assassination were in place and where "Mac"
Wallace, his personal hit-man, appears to have been involved as one of
the shooters. I regard this as a major advance--when have you heard
any of them identified as key players, apart from Part 9, "The Men Who
Killed Kennedy", where Nigel Turner fingered LBJ and the world broke
out in panic, the segment was banned, and the cover-up continued? I
expect more of those of greater intellect and deeper understanding, if
I may; and for that reason I am profoundly bothered by your reception.
Politics/Politics/Executioner model, which is primarily an alternative
language for saying the same thing. To bring the public from concern
about the Executioners to the Politicians, such as LBJ, Nixon, Ford and
Bush, is, in my opinion, a great advance. It would be wonderful if the
public could ultimately become informed of the Deep Political aspects
as well, but focusing attention on the Political aspects is a tremendous
advance. I therefore find it offensive when you suggest there is some
massively negative aspect about it. The public could never be brought
to understand the Deep Political aspects without initially understanding
the Political specs. And Lyndon was the "pivotal player" because he was
the one who had the driving ambition to become president, knew all of
the players, and was instrumental in bringing "The Big Event" about, as
Madeleine has explained and Billy Sol has confirmed. LBJ even sent his
chief administrative assistant, Cliff Carter, to Dallas to make sure that all
of the arrangements for the assassination were in place and where "Mac"
Wallace, his personal hit-man, appears to have been involved as one of
the shooters. I regard this as a major advance--when have you heard
any of them identified as key players, apart from Part 9, "The Men Who
Killed Kennedy", where Nigel Turner fingered LBJ and the world broke
out in panic, the segment was banned, and the cover-up continued? I
expect more of those of greater intellect and deeper understanding, if
I may; and for that reason I am profoundly bothered by your reception.
Charles Drago Wrote:What would be most helpful to me as I read the "mastermind" book are your responses to my previous questions, Jim.
And to these:
What is your model for the JFK conspiracy?
Are you familiar with the Evica/Drago three-tiered (Sponsor/Facilitator/Mechanic) model?
Was LBJ at the very top of the Sponsorship level of the JFK conspiracy?
Did LBJ have the ultimate authority to order the hit on JFK?
Did LBJ have the ultimate authority to take this world-historic action even if the financial, industrial, and military interests who were above Cold War differences objected?
Was LBJ the "mastermind" of the anti-FDR plot broken up by Smedley Butler?
Did LBJ rule the world?
By the way, I define "Sponsor" as, in this case, a master to whom presidents and other grand puppets answer.