Lack of continuity between Dallas & Chicago plots

[Gary Loughran]

Myra is correct. An ANFO bomb cannot do the damage which occurred in the Murrah case. The truck was parked 20/30 feet away from the OUTSIDE of the building, yet building debris was EJECTED away from the building hundreds of feet away, indicating in internal explosion. General Partin, a highly qualified expert said NO WAY. Support columns were cut, which was impossible using an ANFO bomb OUTSIDE the building.

A good article on the alleged ANFO bomb in this case compares it to the MC rifle in the JFK case. Click on:

http://www.constitution.org/ocbpt/ocbpt_01.htm

Jack

A fertiliser based bomb can do that damage. The above article actually does little, if anything, to refute that fact. The photos etc. of Oklahoma I have seem are comparable to damage inflicted by other fertiliser based bombs.

A red post box stood unscathed from the Manchester bomb despite being feet away from the centre of the explosion.

I am not stating it was definitely a fertiliser based bomb that was used.

More broadly I am saying the comment that a fertiliser based bomb could not do the damage attributed to Oklahoma is plain wrong.