10-12-2010, 05:00 PM
Jack White Wrote:That is easy. Absolutely NO DOCUMENTATION exists that the FBI, Secret Service, CIA, Naval Intelligence, Garrison,
Warren Commission, House Committee, Church Committee
or hundreds of JFK Researchers ever noticed ANY of the
events described by JVB, even though all of these named
groups either were controlling, watching, studying or otherwise
at all times figuring LHO's every move in New Orleans.
Now you tell me how JVB managed to be so invisible to all of
the above that NO DOCUMENTATION EXISTS!
John relied on DOCUMENTATION or personal interviews and
research for his book. Not a single document refers to Baker.
Now you tell me whether she belongs in H&L.
Jack
I should mention that the above is a definitive comment. Part of
John's methodology was to order from the National Archives
EVERY DOCUMENT which contained the word OSWALD. This
dragnet included THOUSANDS of documents which filled
40+ 4" 4-ring notebooks. Included as containing "OSWALD"
were Lee, Robert, Marina, Pic, Marguerite, or any other
event or association referring to OSWALD. If the archive
search had turned up Oswald having an affair with an
unknown woman in New Orleans, John emphasizes to
me it would have been among the papers. But it would
not stop with "unknown woman"...she would be tracked
down to a minute extent, and her Florida classmates
would have been interviewed, her trips to Ferrie's
apartment noted, her address found, her neighbors
interviewed, her connections to Dutz Murret discovered,
her cancer experiments with Oschner investigated, her
employment at Reily questioned, her family traced, etc.
etc. etc. Investigators who checked into Jack Ruby's
sister's false teeth or Oswald's pubic hairs would leave
no stone unturned if they found LHO had a mistress.
On this basis alone, John never took seriously any claims
by JVB.
Jack
Jack,
Please don't read this as a negative assessment of Armstrong's work (which I respect) or an endorsement of JVB. I simply seek clarification, so please correct me if I'm mis-reading you:
The premise of your argument as made above is that all Oswald-related records either are accessible or have left faint images behind even after violent redaction.
Charles