10-12-2010, 07:52 PM
(This post was last modified: 10-12-2010, 07:56 PM by Jan Klimkowski.)
Ed - A fine statement of principle, but I disagree with your end sentiment in the extract below.
DPF should not delete articles which have been deconstructed.
Rather, DPF should keep such articles. And their deconstruction.
That is the historical and dialectic process
Ed Jewett Wrote:I appreciate and have said that I am a relative newcomer to this business of deep political reading, research and analysis. I have a great degree of respect for many people here, like David Guyatt and others, and if he has dismantled a post, then so be it. That is, as has already been said, the nature of the process. My hat is off to him. No skin off my teeth. No wounded ego. Delete it.
DPF should not delete articles which have been deconstructed.
Rather, DPF should keep such articles. And their deconstruction.
That is the historical and dialectic process
"It means this War was never political at all, the politics was all theatre, all just to keep the people distracted...."
"Proverbs for Paranoids 4: You hide, They seek."
"They are in Love. Fuck the War."
Gravity's Rainbow, Thomas Pynchon
"Ccollanan Pachacamac ricuy auccacunac yahuarniy hichascancuta."
The last words of the last Inka, Tupac Amaru, led to the gallows by men of god & dogs of war
"Proverbs for Paranoids 4: You hide, They seek."
"They are in Love. Fuck the War."
Gravity's Rainbow, Thomas Pynchon
"Ccollanan Pachacamac ricuy auccacunac yahuarniy hichascancuta."
The last words of the last Inka, Tupac Amaru, led to the gallows by men of god & dogs of war

